Shelly Chadha

56 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Shelly Chadha
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Sensory Systems 512
  • Otorhinolaryngology 189
  • Speech and Hearing 222
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 459
  • Neurology 97
Replace Il Joon Moon with:
Il Joon Moon South Korea
Elisabetta Genovese Italy
Francesca Forlì Italy
Martin Walger Germany
Che‐Ming Wu Taiwan
Domenico Cuda Italy
Samantha Anne United States
Peter Watkin United Kingdom
Katrin Neumann Germany
Dayna S. Dalton United States
Shelly Chadha relative to Il Joon Moon South Korea Il Joon Moon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Il Joon Moon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Shelly Chadha

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shelly Chadha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shelly Chadha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shelly Chadha more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shelly Chadha

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shelly Chadha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shelly Chadha. The network helps show where Shelly Chadha may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Shelly Chadha, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Shelly Chadha Line = papers co-authored together Shelly Chadha links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016278
2 2021117
3 200984
4 202076
5 201967
6
Deafness: burden, prevention and control in India.
200967
7 200865
8 202258
9 201955
10 201449
11 202141
12 202241
13 200537
14 202236
15 202036
16 202133
17 201230
18 201826
19 202022
20 201821

About Shelly Chadha

Shelly Chadha is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience, Otorhinolaryngology, Speech and Hearing and Surgery, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (17 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (16 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (11 papers), Noise Effects and Management (8 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (3 papers), Wikis in Education and Collaboration (2 papers), Ear and Head Tumors (2 papers) and Vestibular and auditory disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (512 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (189 citations), Speech and Hearing (222 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (459 citations) and Neurology (97 citations). Shelly Chadha has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Catherine McMahon, Adrian Davis, David McDaid, A‐La Park, Frank R. Lin, Bolajoko O. Olusanya, Kelly L. Tremblay, Shirley A. Russ, Kaloyan Kamenov and Ricardo X Martinez. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Audiology, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, BMJ Global Health, Archives of Oral Biology and BMC Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact