Sheldon M. Cohen
- Philosophy top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Archeology top 5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 5%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Helen S. LangGareth B. MatthewsCharles ReevePatricia CurdP. BurkeDavid KeytMyles BurnyeatGregory Vlastos
- Topics
- Classical Philosophy and Thought (19 papers)Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers)Medieval and Classical Philosophy (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Sheldon M. Cohen
28 papers receiving 161 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Philosophy 168
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 53
- Archeology 50
- History and Philosophy of Science 46
- Anthropology 42
Countries citing papers authored by Sheldon M. Cohen
This map shows the geographic impact of Sheldon M. Cohen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sheldon M. Cohen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sheldon M. Cohen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sheldon M. Cohen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sheldon M. Cohen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sheldon M. Cohen. The network helps show where Sheldon M. Cohen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sheldon M. Cohen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sheldon M. Cohen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sheldon M. Cohen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sheldon M. Cohen. Sheldon M. Cohen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Plato's Euthyphro, Apology, and Crito Critical Essays | 3 |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | Analyzing Plato's Arguments: Plato and Platonism | 2 |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | On Aristotle Categories | 2 |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | Individual and Essence in Aristotle's Metaphysics | 4 |
| 14 | Essentialism in Aristotle | 12 |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | The One and the Many | 12 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Sheldon M. Cohen
Sheldon M. Cohen is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Archeology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 242 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (19 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers) and Medieval and Classical Philosophy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (168 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (46 citations) and Archeology (50 citations). Sheldon M. Cohen has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Helen S. Lang, Gareth B. Matthews, Charles Reeve, Patricia Curd, P. Burke, David Keyt, Myles Burnyeat, Gregory Vlastos, Terence Irwin and Rachana Kamtekar. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.