Sharon S. Ehrmeyer

733 total citations
50 papers, 536 citations indexed

About

Sharon S. Ehrmeyer is a scholar working on Physiology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Medical Laboratory Technology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sharon S. Ehrmeyer has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 536 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Physiology, 18 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and 10 papers in Medical Laboratory Technology. Recurrent topics in Sharon S. Ehrmeyer's work include Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (33 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (11 papers) and Quality and Safety in Healthcare (10 papers). Sharon S. Ehrmeyer is often cited by papers focused on Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (33 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (11 papers) and Quality and Safety in Healthcare (10 papers). Sharon S. Ehrmeyer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Italy. Sharon S. Ehrmeyer's co-authors include Ronald H. Laessig, Gerald J. Kost, James W. Winkelman, Bart Chernow, Gary P. Zaloga, Terry Shirey, Mario Plebani, Rob Jansen, N. De Jonge and Carmen Ricós and has published in prestigious journals such as CHEST Journal, Clinical Chemistry and Clinica Chimica Acta.

In The Last Decade

Sharon S. Ehrmeyer

47 papers receiving 496 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sharon S. Ehrmeyer United States 12 294 136 86 75 62 50 536
Stephen Church United Kingdom 8 591 2.0× 311 2.3× 93 1.1× 23 0.3× 97 1.6× 31 779
Daniel Tholen United States 9 57 0.2× 55 0.4× 32 0.4× 17 0.2× 64 1.0× 31 390
Colleen Shaw United States 7 137 0.5× 76 0.6× 35 0.4× 11 0.1× 105 1.7× 8 377
Diana Mass United States 6 136 0.5× 78 0.6× 19 0.2× 11 0.1× 85 1.4× 12 315
Márcia L. Zucker United States 10 65 0.2× 25 0.2× 71 0.8× 20 0.3× 39 0.6× 27 355
A. B. J. Nix United Kingdom 9 31 0.1× 69 0.5× 70 0.8× 5 0.1× 41 0.7× 27 353
Michiel Schinkel Netherlands 13 39 0.1× 14 0.1× 54 0.6× 47 0.6× 106 1.7× 31 800
Roger Wilson Australia 7 41 0.1× 16 0.1× 17 0.2× 7 0.1× 97 1.6× 18 323
Stephen R. C. Howie Gambia 12 31 0.1× 5 0.0× 33 0.4× 28 0.4× 109 1.8× 18 630
Eun‐Jung Cho South Korea 11 25 0.1× 18 0.1× 33 0.4× 15 0.2× 14 0.2× 42 319

Countries citing papers authored by Sharon S. Ehrmeyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sharon S. Ehrmeyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sharon S. Ehrmeyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sharon S. Ehrmeyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sharon S. Ehrmeyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sharon S. Ehrmeyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sharon S. Ehrmeyer. The network helps show where Sharon S. Ehrmeyer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sharon S. Ehrmeyer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sharon S. Ehrmeyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sharon S. Ehrmeyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sharon S. Ehrmeyer. Sharon S. Ehrmeyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ehrmeyer, Sharon S.. (2012). Satisfying Regulatory and Accreditation Requirements for Quality Control. Clinics in Laboratory Medicine. 33(1). 27–40. 7 indexed citations
2.
Ehrmeyer, Sharon S.. (2011). The US Regulatory Requirements for Point-of-Care Testing. Point of Care The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology. 10(2). 59–62. 2 indexed citations
3.
Jonge, N. De, et al.. (2011). Collective opinion paper on findings of the 2010 convocation of experts on laboratory quality. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). 49(5). 793–802. 57 indexed citations
4.
Ehrmeyer, Sharon S. & Ronald H. Laessig. (2009). Regulatory Compliance for Point-of-Care Testing: 2009 United States Perspective. Clinics in Laboratory Medicine. 29(3). 463–478. 11 indexed citations
5.
Ehrmeyer, Sharon S. & Ronald H. Laessig. (2008). Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Equivalent Quality Control and Manufacturers' Internal Quality Control Systems. Point of Care The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology. 7(2). 76–78. 2 indexed citations
6.
Ehrmeyer, Sharon S. & Ronald H. Laessig. (2007). Point-of-care testing, medical error, and patient safety: a 2007 assessment. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). 45(6). 766–73. 59 indexed citations
7.
Ehrmeyer, Sharon S. & Ronald H. Laessig. (2006). Regulatory compliance vs. NEXUS quality for laboratory tests. Accreditation and Quality Assurance. 11(6). 265–268. 1 indexed citations
8.
Ehrmeyer, Sharon S. & Ronald H. Laessig. (2004). Has compliance with CLIA requirements really improved quality in US clinical laboratories?. Clinica Chimica Acta. 346(1). 37–43. 19 indexed citations
9.
Ehrmeyer, Sharon S. & Ronald H. Laessig. (2001). Electronic “Quality Control” (EQC): is it just for unit use devices?. Clinica Chimica Acta. 307(1-2). 95–99. 4 indexed citations
10.
Kost, Gerald J., Sharon S. Ehrmeyer, Bart Chernow, et al.. (1999). The Laboratory-Clinical Interface. CHEST Journal. 115(4). 1140–1154. 106 indexed citations
11.
Ehrmeyer, Sharon S. & Ronald H. Laessig. (1999). The American (USA) perspective six years after implementation of CLIA'88 (Federal) regulations. Accreditation and Quality Assurance. 4(3). 93–98. 2 indexed citations
12.
Ehrmeyer, Sharon S. & Ronald H. Laessig. (1995). Regulatory requirements (CLIA '88, JCAHO, CAP) for decentralized testing.. PubMed. 104(4 Suppl 1). S40–9. 25 indexed citations
13.
Laessig, Ronald H., et al.. (1992). Limitations of Proficiency Testing Under CLIA '67. Clinical Chemistry. 38(7). 1237–1244. 7 indexed citations
14.
Ehrmeyer, Sharon S., et al.. (1992). Review of Actual Proficiency-Testing Performance Under CLIA '67 (March 14, 1990) Rules: Perspective from the First Year's Data. Clinical Chemistry. 38(7). 1254–1259. 2 indexed citations
15.
Laessig, Ronald H., et al.. (1992). Health Care Financing Administration's new proficiency testing rules. Use of a statistical approach to predict long-term performance using the categories 'successful,' 'probation,' and 'suspended'.. PubMed. 116(7). 770–6. 3 indexed citations
16.
Laessig, Ronald H., et al.. (1992). Intralaboratory Performance Requirements Necessary to Pass Proficiency Testing: CAP-1990 vs CLIA-1967 (March 14, 1990) Formats Compared. Clinical Chemistry. 38(6). 895–903. 5 indexed citations
17.
Ehrmeyer, Sharon S., et al.. (1990). 1990 Medicare/CLIA final rules for proficiency testing: minimum intralaboratory performance characteristics (CV and bias) needed to pass. Clinical Chemistry. 36(10). 1736–1740. 46 indexed citations
18.
Laessig, Ronald H., Sharon S. Ehrmeyer, & David J. Hassemer. (1986). Quality Control and Quality Assurance. Clinics in Laboratory Medicine. 6(2). 317–327. 15 indexed citations
19.
Ehrmeyer, Sharon S. & Ronald H. Laessig. (1985). Alternative statistical approach to evaluating interlaboratory performance.. Clinical Chemistry. 31(1). 106–108. 6 indexed citations
20.
Ehrmeyer, Sharon S.. (1980). Continuing education: a practical programming model for new planners.. PubMed. 9(4). 276–82.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026