Shari Shea
About
In The Last Decade
Shari Shea
5 papers receiving 276 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Infectious Diseases 210
- Endocrinology 180
- Food Science 81
- Biotechnology 34
- Epidemiology 29
Countries citing papers authored by Shari Shea
This map shows the geographic impact of Shari Shea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shari Shea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shari Shea more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Shari Shea
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shari Shea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shari Shea. The network helps show where Shari Shea may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shari Shea
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shari Shea. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shari Shea based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shari Shea. Shari Shea is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 48 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | Recommendations for diagnosis of shiga toxin--producing Escherichia coli infections by clinical laboratories. | 217 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.