Shari R. Baum

5.8k total citations
149 papers, 3.9k citations indexed

About

Shari R. Baum is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Shari R. Baum has authored 149 papers receiving a total of 3.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 113 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 85 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 71 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Shari R. Baum's work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (90 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (60 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (48 papers). Shari R. Baum is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (90 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (60 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (48 papers). Shari R. Baum collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Shari R. Baum's co-authors include Marc D. Pell, Vincent L. Gracco, Debra Titone, Ekaterini Klepousniotou, David H. McFarland, Douglas M. Shiller, Sheila E. Blumstein, Robert J. Zatorre, Denise Klein and Isabelle Deschamps and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, NeuroImage and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Shari R. Baum

147 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Shari R. Baum Canada 37 2.8k 2.1k 1.7k 417 299 149 3.9k
Diana Van Lancker United States 27 1.9k 0.7× 1.3k 0.6× 706 0.4× 319 0.8× 300 1.0× 59 2.9k
Niels O. Schiller Netherlands 36 3.3k 1.2× 1.5k 0.7× 2.5k 1.5× 326 0.8× 327 1.1× 164 4.2k
Mitchell S. Sommers United States 35 3.8k 1.3× 2.6k 1.3× 1.0k 0.6× 609 1.5× 359 1.2× 120 4.9k
Sven L. Mattys United Kingdom 32 2.0k 0.7× 2.3k 1.1× 1.5k 0.9× 680 1.6× 60 0.2× 78 3.6k
D. H. Whalen United States 34 1.5k 0.5× 3.1k 1.5× 897 0.5× 1.2k 2.9× 209 0.7× 168 4.1k
Andrew J. Lotto United States 28 1.3k 0.5× 1.9k 0.9× 504 0.3× 550 1.3× 159 0.5× 94 2.7k
Grace H. Yeni–Komshian United States 26 1.6k 0.6× 1.6k 0.8× 967 0.6× 464 1.1× 141 0.5× 61 3.1k
Ingo Hertrich Germany 34 2.3k 0.8× 1.4k 0.7× 474 0.3× 265 0.6× 310 1.0× 105 3.5k
Alexander L. Francis United States 31 1.5k 0.5× 1.9k 0.9× 750 0.4× 518 1.2× 86 0.3× 78 2.7k
M. Gareth Gaskell United Kingdom 41 4.7k 1.7× 3.1k 1.5× 3.5k 2.1× 1.1k 2.6× 231 0.8× 134 6.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Shari R. Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shari R. Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shari R. Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shari R. Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shari R. Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shari R. Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shari R. Baum. The network helps show where Shari R. Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shari R. Baum

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shari R. Baum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shari R. Baum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shari R. Baum. Shari R. Baum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gullifer, Jason W., et al.. (2025). Finding the key in Kiwi during second language spoken production: Low proficiency speakers sound more native-like if they live in mixed-language environments.. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. 80(1). 10–21.
2.
Clayards, Meghan, et al.. (2024). Individual differences in the consistency of neural and behavioural responses to speech sounds. Brain Research. 1845. 149208–149208. 1 indexed citations
3.
Baum, Shari R., et al.. (2023). Phrase parsing in a second language as indexed by the closure positive shift: The impact of language experience and acoustic cue salience. European Journal of Neuroscience. 58(8). 3838–3858. 1 indexed citations
4.
Phillips, Natalie A., et al.. (2020). Near native-like stress pattern perception in English-French bilinguals as indexed by the mismatch negativity. Brain and Language. 213. 104892–104892. 1 indexed citations
5.
Titone, Debra, et al.. (2016). The role of the ventro-lateral prefrontal cortex in idiom comprehension: An rTMS study. Neuropsychologia. 91. 360–370. 10 indexed citations
6.
Berken, Jonathan A., Vincent L. Gracco, Jen‐Kai Chen, et al.. (2015). Neural activation in speech production and reading aloud in native and non-native languages. NeuroImage. 112. 208–217. 50 indexed citations
7.
Baum, Shari R., et al.. (2014). Misleading Bias-Driven Expectations in Referential Processing and the Facilitative Role of Contrastive Accent. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 44(5). 623–650. 11 indexed citations
8.
Phillips, Natalie A., Shari R. Baum, & Vanessa Taler. (2009). Audio-visual speech perception in mild cognitive impairment and healthy elderly controls.. AVSP. 59–64. 2 indexed citations
9.
Taler, Vanessa, Shari R. Baum, Howard Chertkow, & Daniel Saumier. (2008). Comprehension of grammatical and emotional prosody is impaired in Alzheimer's disease.. Neuropsychology. 22(2). 188–195. 40 indexed citations
10.
Taler, Vanessa, Shari R. Baum, & Daniel Saumier. (2006). Perception of Linguistic and Affective Prosody in Younger and Older Adults. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 28(28). 3 indexed citations
11.
Baum, Shari R., et al.. (2003). Impaired processing of prosodic and musical patterns after right hemisphere damage. Brain and Cognition. 52(3). 382–389. 34 indexed citations
12.
Baum, Shari R., et al.. (2003). Temporal parameters as cues to phrasal boundaries: A comparison of processing by left- and right-hemisphere brain-damaged individuals. Brain and Language. 87(3). 385–399. 29 indexed citations
13.
Baum, Shari R., et al.. (2001). A CASE OF MULTIMODAL APROSODIA: IMPAIRED AUDITORY AND VISUAL SPEECH PROSODY PERCEPTION IN A PATIENT WITH RIGHT HEMISPHERE DAMAGE. AVSP. 62–65. 1 indexed citations
14.
Leonard, Carol L., Shari R. Baum, & Marc D. Pell. (2001). The Effect of Compressed Speech on the Ability of Right-Hemisphere-Damaged Patients to Use Context. Cortex. 37(3). 327–344. 16 indexed citations
15.
Baum, Shari R., et al.. (1999). The Influence of Neighborhood Density on Phonetic Categorization in Aphasia. Brain and Language. 67(1). 46–70. 15 indexed citations
16.
Baum, Shari R.. (1997). Phonological, Semantic, and Mediated Priming in Aphasia. Brain and Language. 60(3). 347–359. 29 indexed citations
17.
Pell, Marc D. & Shari R. Baum. (1997). Unilateral Brain Damage, Prosodic Comprehension Deficits, and the Acoustic Cues to Prosody. Brain and Language. 57(2). 195–214. 84 indexed citations
18.
Baum, Shari R., et al.. (1994). Rhyme Priming in Aphasia: The Role of Phonology in Lexical Access. Brain and Language. 47(4). 661–683. 21 indexed citations
19.
Baum, Shari R.. (1993). An Acoustic Analysis of Rate of Speech Effects on Vowel Production in Aphasia. Brain and Language. 44(4). 414–430. 15 indexed citations
20.
Baum, Shari R.. (1986). Syntactic processing in aphasia. UMI Dissertation Information Service eBooks. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026