Seth T. Fairfax
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 2%
- Physiology
- Surgery
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems top 10%
- Co-authors
- Paul J. FadelLauro C. ViannaMichael J. DavisJaume PadillaMichael J. JoynerEmma C. HartNisha CharkoudianSeth W. Holwerda
- Topics
- Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (7 papers)Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (5 papers)Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Complementary and alternative medicineCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineEndocrine and Autonomic Systems
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Seth T. Fairfax
10 papers receiving 402 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 340
- Complementary and alternative medicine 192
- Physiology 98
- Surgery 62
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 50
Countries citing papers authored by Seth T. Fairfax
This map shows the geographic impact of Seth T. Fairfax's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Seth T. Fairfax with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Seth T. Fairfax more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Seth T. Fairfax
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Seth T. Fairfax. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Seth T. Fairfax. The network helps show where Seth T. Fairfax may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Seth T. Fairfax
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Seth T. Fairfax. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Seth T. Fairfax based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Seth T. Fairfax. Seth T. Fairfax is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 113 | |
| 7 | 78 | |
| 8 | 25 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 95 | |
| 11 | 35 |
About Seth T. Fairfax
Seth T. Fairfax is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Sensory Systems, having authored 11 papers that have together received 403 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (7 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (5 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (192 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (340 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (50 citations). Seth T. Fairfax has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paul J. Fadel, Lauro C. Vianna, Michael J. Davis, Jaume Padilla, Michael J. Joyner, Emma C. Hart, Nisha Charkoudian, Seth W. Holwerda, Daniel P. Credeur and Mozow Y. Zuidema. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, The FASEB Journal and Journal of Applied Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.