Sergei Schaub
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences top 2%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Plant Science
- Ecology
- Co-authors
- Robert FingerJaboury GhazoulNina BuchmannRobert HuberA. LüscherMichael KreuzerWei ZhangSimanti Banerjee
- Topics
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices (8 papers)Economic and Environmental Valuation (7 papers)Forest Management and Policy (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Sergei Schaub
18 papers receiving 391 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 121
- Global and Planetary Change 112
- Economics and Econometrics 93
- Plant Science 74
- Ecology 63
Countries citing papers authored by Sergei Schaub
This map shows the geographic impact of Sergei Schaub's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sergei Schaub with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sergei Schaub more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sergei Schaub
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sergei Schaub. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sergei Schaub. The network helps show where Sergei Schaub may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sergei Schaub
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sergei Schaub. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sergei Schaub based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sergei Schaub. Sergei Schaub is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | The role of behavioural factors and opportunity costs in farmers' participation in voluntary agri‐environmental schemes: A systematic reviewbreakdown → | 79 |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 49 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 79 | |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 43 |
About Sergei Schaub
Sergei Schaub is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Business and International Management and Forestry, having authored 19 papers that have together received 397 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agricultural Innovations and Practices (8 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (7 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (121 citations), Forestry (33 citations) and Soil Science (57 citations). Sergei Schaub has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert Finger, Jaboury Ghazoul, Nina Buchmann, Robert Huber, A. Lüscher, Michael Kreuzer, Wei Zhang, Simanti Banerjee, Michael Scherer‐Lorenzen and Alexandra Weigelt. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Ecological Economics and Environmental Research Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.