Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Mobile cloud computing: A survey
20121.1k citationsNiroshinie Fernando, Seng W. Loke et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Seng W. Loke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Seng W. Loke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Seng W. Loke more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Seng W. Loke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Seng W. Loke. The network helps show where Seng W. Loke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Seng W. Loke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Seng W. Loke.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Seng W. Loke based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Seng W. Loke. Seng W. Loke is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Yang, Laurence, et al.. (2012). Handbook on Mobile and Ubiquitous Computing: Status and Perspective. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).2 indexed citations
9.
Loke, Seng W., et al.. (2008). Formal Mirror Models: an Approach to Just-in-Time Reasoning for Device Ecologies. International Journal of Smart Home. 2(1). 15–31.8 indexed citations
10.
Loke, Seng W., et al.. (2007). Simulated intersection environment and learning of collision and traffic data in the U & I aware framework. Figshare.1 indexed citations
11.
Loke, Seng W., et al.. (2005). Methods for policy conflict detection and resolution in pervasive computing environments.. 13–20.32 indexed citations
12.
Loke, Seng W., et al.. (2004). Performance issues in an infrastructure for Mobile Hanging Services. 1–6.4 indexed citations
Loke, Seng W., et al.. (2004). CALMA: Context-Aware Lightweight Mobile BDI Agents for ubiquitous computing. 1–8.2 indexed citations
15.
Padovitz, Amir, et al.. (2004). Towards a general approach for reasoning about context situations and uncertainty in ubiquitous sensing : putting geometrical intuitions to work. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology).7 indexed citations
16.
Loke, Seng W.. (2003). An exploration of agent assistance for physical marketplaces: proximity-based reverse auctions. 124–135.2 indexed citations
17.
Krishnaswamy, Shonali, Arkady Zaslavsky, & Seng W. Loke. (2002). Predicting run times of applications using rough sets. 455–469.1 indexed citations
18.
Loke, Seng W., et al.. (2001). Scripting mobile agents to support cooperative work in the 21st century. Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems. 1–10.2 indexed citations
Krishnaswamy, Shonali, Arkady Zaslavsky, & Seng W. Loke. (2001). Towards data mining services on the Internet with a multiple service provider model : an XML based approach. Journal of electronic commerce research. 2(3). 103–130.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.