Scott Schaeffer
Impact in
- Plant Science top 10%
- Plant Virus Research Studies
- Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Papers in
-
- Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms 3
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 2
- Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis 1
- Plant Gene Expression Analysis 1
-
- Plant Virus Research Studies 2
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 1
- Co-authors
- Paul A. Nakata (2 shared papers)M. Krech (1 shared paper)Jason C. L. Brown (1 shared paper)Mary Ann Fieldes (1 shared paper)Amit Dhingra (6 shared papers)Tyson Koepke (3 shared papers)Luying Xun (1 shared paper)Derick Jiwan (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Plant Cell Reports (2 papers)Theoretical and Applied Genetics (1 paper)Plant Biotechnology Journal (1 paper)Insect Science (1 paper)Biodegradation (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesDenmarkChile
In The Last Decade
Scott Schaeffer
10 papers receiving 295 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Plant Science 193
- Business and International Management 9
- Molecular Biology 197
- Aging 4
- Insect Science 28
Countries citing papers authored by Scott Schaeffer
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Schaeffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Schaeffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Schaeffer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Schaeffer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Schaeffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Schaeffer. The network helps show where Scott Schaeffer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Scott Schaeffer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 105 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 4 |
About Scott Schaeffer
Scott Schaeffer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Insect Science, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pollution, having authored 10 papers that have together received 299 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (3 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (2 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (1 paper), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (1 paper), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (1 paper), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (1 paper) and Plant Gene Expression Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (193 citations), Business and International Management (9 citations), Molecular Biology (197 citations), Aging (4 citations) and Insect Science (28 citations). Scott Schaeffer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Paul A. Nakata, M. Krech, Jason C. L. Brown, Mary Ann Fieldes, Amit Dhingra, Tyson Koepke, Luying Xun, Derick Jiwan, Sara M. Belchik and Nnadozie Oraguzie. Their work appears in journals such as Plant Cell Reports, Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Plant Biotechnology Journal, Insect Science and Biodegradation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.