Scott Penfil

1.1k citations
25 papers · 752 indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Scott Penfil

24 papers receiving 737 citations

Peers

Scott Penfil
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 139
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 113
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 107
  • Emergency Medicine 121
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 337
Replace Enyo Ablordeppey with:
Enyo Ablordeppey United States
Gijs D. Vos Netherlands
Shamel Abd‐Allah United States
Elamin M. Elamin United States
Sanjoy Shah United Kingdom
Heder de Vries Netherlands
Faraaz Shah United States
Christine Penot-Ragon France
Peter D. Sottile United States
Meena Kalyanaraman United States
Scott Penfil relative to Enyo Ablordeppey United States Enyo Ablordeppey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.4×
Enyo Ablordeppey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Penfil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Penfil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Penfil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Penfil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Penfil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Penfil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Penfil. The network helps show where Scott Penfil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Penfil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Penfil Line = papers co-authored together Scott Penfil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202010
2 202014
3 20198
4 201820
5 20187
6 201710
7 20172
8 201512
9 20135
10 20117
11 200833
12 200791
13 200750
14 2007168
15 20062
16 20050
17 2003211
18 20037
19 199668
20 199510

About Scott Penfil

Scott Penfil is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 25 papers that have together received 752 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (5 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (5 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (3 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (2 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers) and Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (139 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (113 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (107 citations), Emergency Medicine (121 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (337 citations). Scott Penfil has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas Slamon, James H. Hertzog, Neal J. Thomas, Marie Monaco, Michael Barnes, Richard J. Lin, Nancy M. Tofil, Meena Kalyanaraman, Allan Doctor and Bruce J. Aronow. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care Medicine, Pediatric Emergency Care, Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, PEDIATRICS and Physiological Genomics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026