Robert M. Parker

131 total papers · 3.2k total citations
15 papers, 272 citations indexed

About

Robert M. Parker is a scholar working on Small Animals, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert M. Parker has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 272 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Small Animals, 2 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 2 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. Recurrent topics in Robert M. Parker's work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (2 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (2 papers) and Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (2 papers). Robert M. Parker is often cited by papers focused on Fish Ecology and Management Studies (2 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (2 papers) and Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (2 papers). Robert M. Parker collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. Robert M. Parker's co-authors include N.J. Silvernail, Kenton R. Rodgers, Timothy E. Elgren, David L. Ward, Thomas M. Burbacher, Norman W. Klein, Gene P. Sackett, Andrew G. Hendrickx, Gerhard F. Weinbauer and Alan M. Hoberman and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Toxicology Letters.

In The Last Decade

Robert M. Parker

15 papers receiving 244 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Robert M. Parker 50 46 38 35 28 15 272
Priyanka Singh 40 0.8× 22 0.5× 4 0.1× 84 2.4× 22 0.8× 33 327
Linda M. Brennan 97 1.9× 19 0.4× 27 0.7× 71 2.0× 9 0.3× 20 309
Bianca Helena Ventura Fernandes 89 1.8× 7 0.2× 13 0.3× 17 0.5× 12 0.4× 16 270
James L. Peters 18 0.4× 28 0.6× 7 0.2× 22 0.6× 21 0.8× 9 208
Chris Murdock 78 1.6× 29 0.6× 3 0.1× 25 0.7× 27 1.0× 11 309
Aqin Chen 62 1.2× 7 0.2× 3 0.1× 40 1.1× 44 1.6× 24 315
Rahul Chakraborty 62 1.2× 9 0.2× 9 0.2× 10 0.3× 6 0.2× 29 224
Diana C. Castañeda-Cortés 15 0.3× 21 0.5× 3 0.1× 86 2.5× 37 1.3× 9 280
Amanda N. Buerger 81 1.6× 12 0.3× 2 0.1× 106 3.0× 38 1.4× 22 295
Hong Lin 67 1.3× 43 0.9× 8 0.2× 29 0.8× 164 5.9× 15 316

Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Parker. The network helps show where Robert M. Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert M. Parker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert M. Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert M. Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert M. Parker. Robert M. Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026