Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Landscape Ecology: The Effect of Pattern on Process
Countries citing papers authored by Monica G. Turner
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Monica G. Turner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Monica G. Turner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Monica G. Turner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Monica G. Turner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Monica G. Turner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Monica G. Turner. The network helps show where Monica G. Turner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Monica G. Turner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Monica G. Turner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Monica G. Turner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Monica G. Turner. Monica G. Turner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Albrich, Katharina, Werner Rammer, Monica G. Turner, et al.. (2020). Simulating forest resilience: A review. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 29(12). 2082–2096.78 indexed citations
Spake, Rebecca, Rémy Lasseur, Émilie Crouzat, et al.. (2017). Unpacking ecosystem service bundles: Towards predictive mapping of synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change. 47. 37–50.271 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Qiu, Jiangxiao & Monica G. Turner. (2013). Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110(29). 12149–12154.380 indexed citations breakdown →
Turner, Monica G., Robert H. Gardner, & R. V. O’Neill. (2001). Landscape ecology in theory and practice : pattern and process. TU Digital Collections (Thammasat University).1136 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Pearson, Scott M., et al.. (1998). Forest Patch Size, Land Use, and Mesic Forest Herbs in the French Broad River Basin, North Carolina. Castanea. 63(3). 382–395.35 indexed citations
18.
Romme, William H., Monica G. Turner, Robert H. Gardner, et al.. (1997). A rare episode of sexual reproduction in aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) following the 1988 Yellowstone fires. Natural Areas Journal. 17(1). 17–25.73 indexed citations
19.
Turner, Monica G. & Robert H. Gardner. (1991). Quantitative methods in landscape ecology : the analysis and interpretation of landscape heterogeneity. Springer eBooks.229 indexed citations
20.
Turner, Monica G.. (1990). Landscape changes in nine rural counties in Georgia.. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 56(3). 379–386.96 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.