Scott L. Cockroft
- Organic Chemistry top 1%
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 0.2%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Spectroscopy top 1%
- Materials Chemistry top 5%
- Co-authors
- Christopher A. HunterCatherine AdamIoulia K. MatiKenneth B. LingDominic J. PascoeLixu YangM. Reza GhadiriGary S. Nichol
- Topics
- Crystallography and molecular interactions (26 papers)Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies (16 papers)Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Scott L. Cockroft
77 papers receiving 4.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Organic Chemistry 1.8k
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 1.6k
- Molecular Biology 1.5k
- Spectroscopy 933
- Materials Chemistry 893
Countries citing papers authored by Scott L. Cockroft
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott L. Cockroft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott L. Cockroft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott L. Cockroft more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott L. Cockroft
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott L. Cockroft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott L. Cockroft. The network helps show where Scott L. Cockroft may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott L. Cockroft
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott L. Cockroft. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott L. Cockroft based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott L. Cockroft. Scott L. Cockroft is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 48 | |
| 7 | 38 | |
| 8 | 36 | |
| 9 | The Origin of Chalcogen-Bonding Interactionsbreakdown → | 440 |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | 249 | |
| 13 | 273 | |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 198 | |
| 16 | 45 | |
| 17 | 60 | |
| 18 | 114 | |
| 19 | 246 | |
| 20 | 320 |
About Scott L. Cockroft
Scott L. Cockroft is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Spectroscopy and Organic Chemistry, having authored 78 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crystallography and molecular interactions (26 papers), Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies (16 papers) and Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (1.6k citations), Organic Chemistry (1.8k citations) and Spectroscopy (933 citations). Scott L. Cockroft has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Christopher A. Hunter, Catherine Adam, Ioulia K. Mati, Kenneth B. Ling, Dominic J. Pascoe, Lixu Yang, M. Reza Ghadiri, Gary S. Nichol, Christopher J. Urch and Kevin R. Lawson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Chemical Society Reviews and Nucleic Acids Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.