Scott Holbrook
Impact in
- Aging top 5%
- Developmental Neuroscience top 5%
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Papers in
-
- Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation 5
- Retinal Development and Disorders 2
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 5
- Co-authors
- Chris Q. Doe (3 shared papers)Takako Isshiki (2 shared papers)Bret J. Pearson (1 shared paper)R. Edward Coleman (1 shared paper)Henry D. Royal (1 shared paper)Milton J. Guiberteau (1 shared paper)J. Anthony Parker (1 shared paper)Manuel L. Brown (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Neuroscience (3 papers)Neurobiology of Disease (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)Cell (1 paper)Genes & Development (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyAustria
In The Last Decade
Scott Holbrook
11 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Scott Holbrook's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Aging 70
- Developmental Neuroscience 104
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 424
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 258
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 62
Countries citing papers authored by Scott Holbrook
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Holbrook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Holbrook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Holbrook more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Holbrook
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Holbrook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Holbrook. The network helps show where Scott Holbrook may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Holbrook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 494 | |
| 2 | Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with F-18 FDG PET/CT Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 494 |
| 3 | 1998 | 127 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 64 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 36 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 12 | The Expanding Role of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging in Management of Neurodegenerative Disease | 2013 | 1 |
About Scott Holbrook
Scott Holbrook is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pharmacology and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 12 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers), Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (5 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (2 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (2 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (2 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (70 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (104 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (424 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (258 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (62 citations). Scott Holbrook has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Chris Q. Doe, Takako Isshiki, Bret J. Pearson, R. Edward Coleman, Henry D. Royal, Milton J. Guiberteau, J. Anthony Parker, Manuel L. Brown, Barry A. Siegel and David W. Townsend. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Neurobiology of Disease, PLoS ONE, Cell and Genes & Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.