Scott Harrington

685 citations
16 papers · 400 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Scott Harrington

15 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

Scott Harrington
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Demography 127
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 112
  • Economics and Econometrics 234
  • Finance 68
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 63
Replace Ulrich Pötter with:
Ulrich Pötter Germany
Keith Jacks Gamble United States
Péter Hudomiet United States
Mahmoud Mousavi Shiri Iran
Marieke Bos United States
Carli Lessof United Kingdom
Timothy L. Mullett United Kingdom
Xiumin Zhang China
Jan McMillen Australia
Kieran Mc Morrow Belgium
Scott Harrington relative to Ulrich Pötter Germany Ulrich Pötter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.8×
Ulrich Pötter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Harrington

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Harrington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Harrington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Harrington more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Harrington

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Harrington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Harrington. The network helps show where Scott Harrington may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Scott Harrington, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Harrington Line = papers co-authored together Scott Harrington links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1995120
2 198467
3 198567
4 199951
5 198822
6 198816
7
Pharmacology for Canadian Health Care Practice
201010
8 199510
9 20158
10 20037
11 20027
12 20186
13 19703
14
Survey of study habits and attitudes.
19692
15
The Dodd-Frank Act, Solvency II, and U.S. Insurance Regulation
20132
16 19992

About Scott Harrington

Scott Harrington is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Demography, Computer Networks and Communications and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insurance and Financial Risk Management (7 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers), Global Health Care Issues (3 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (3 papers), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (3 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (2 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers) and Age of Information Optimization (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (127 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (112 citations), Economics and Econometrics (234 citations), Finance (68 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (63 citations). Scott Harrington has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include J. David Cummins, Greg Niehaus, Peter Adams, Roseann Hannon, Martin T. Gipson, Robert E. Litan, Stephen P. D’Arcy, Mark V. Pauly, Adam Leive and Tom Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Risk & Insurance, Rehabilitation Psychology, Journal of Educational Measurement, American Journal of Health Economics and Health Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact