Scott H. Liening
Impact in
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
- Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
Papers in
-
- Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior 3
-
- Psychological Testing and Assessment 2
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 1
- Co-authors
- Oliver C. Schultheiss (4 shared papers)Steven J. Stanton (2 shared papers)Ekjyot K. Saini (1 shared paper)Robert Josephs (2 shared papers)Daniel J. Schad (1 shared paper)Stephen L. Ristvedt (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Research in Personality (2 papers)Social and Personality Psychology Compass (1 paper)Psychology and Health (1 paper)Hormones and Behavior (1 paper)Physiology & Behavior (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Scott H. Liening
6 papers receiving 497 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Behavioral Neuroscience 90
- Applied Psychology 115
- General Psychology 29
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 261
- General Decision Sciences 14
Countries citing papers authored by Scott H. Liening
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott H. Liening's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott H. Liening with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott H. Liening more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott H. Liening
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott H. Liening. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott H. Liening. The network helps show where Scott H. Liening may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Scott H. Liening, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 193 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 171 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 60 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 49 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 33 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 7 |
About Scott H. Liening
Scott H. Liening is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and General Psychology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 513 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (2 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (2 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 papers), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (90 citations), Applied Psychology (115 citations), General Psychology (29 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (261 citations) and General Decision Sciences (14 citations). Scott H. Liening has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Oliver C. Schultheiss, Steven J. Stanton, Ekjyot K. Saini, Robert Josephs, Daniel J. Schad and Stephen L. Ristvedt. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Research in Personality, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, Psychology and Health, Hormones and Behavior and Physiology & Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.