Scott Fulmer

18 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers

Scott Fulmer
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 109
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 26
  • Occupational Therapy 48
  • Pharmacology 161
  • Social Psychology 103
Replace Wen‐Yu Yeh with:
Wen‐Yu Yeh Taiwan
Steven J. Wurzelbacher United States
Cammie Chaumont Menéndez United States
David Gilkey United States
Tirthankar Ghosh India
Marie St-Vincent Canada
Kristina Kemmlert Sweden
Anjali Nag India
Davood Afshari Iran
Sunisa Chaiklieng Thailand
Scott Fulmer relative to Wen‐Yu Yeh Taiwan Wen‐Yu Yeh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Wen‐Yu Yeh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Fulmer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Fulmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Fulmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Fulmer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Fulmer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Fulmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Fulmer. The network helps show where Scott Fulmer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Fulmer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Fulmer Line = papers co-authored together Scott Fulmer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200551
2 200238
3 200237
4 201035
5 200425
6 201724
7 201218
8 201517
9 200515
10 201415
11 200212
12 20218
13 20168
14 20196
15 20065
16 20042
17 20122
18 20151
19 20091
20 20220

About Scott Fulmer

Scott Fulmer is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Social Psychology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Biomedical Engineering and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 20 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (9 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (9 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (6 papers), Ergonomics and Human Factors (4 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (2 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (2 papers), Agriculture and Farm Safety (2 papers) and Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (109 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (26 citations), Occupational Therapy (48 citations), Pharmacology (161 citations) and Social Psychology (103 citations). Scott Fulmer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Bryan Buchholz, Paul Jenkins, Giulia Earle‐Richardson, Laura Punnett, Melissa Scribani, David H. Wegman, Patrick Burdick, John J. May, Susan Moir and Yuan Lü. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Ergonomics, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health and Safety and Health at Work.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact