Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Sequestration of Hydrophobic Organic Contaminants by Geosorbents
1997838 citationsRichard G. Luthy, George R. Aiken et al.Environmental Science & Technologyprofile →
Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils: Role of Synthetic Chelates in Lead Phytoextraction
Countries citing papers authored by Scott D. Cunningham
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott D. Cunningham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott D. Cunningham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott D. Cunningham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott D. Cunningham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott D. Cunningham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott D. Cunningham. The network helps show where Scott D. Cunningham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott D. Cunningham
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott D. Cunningham.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott D. Cunningham based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Scott D. Cunningham. Scott D. Cunningham is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Vangronsveld, Jaco & Scott D. Cunningham. (1998). Metal-contaminated soils : In situ inactivation and phytorestoration. Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt).227 indexed citations
5.
Luthy, Richard G., George R. Aiken, Mark L. Brusseau, et al.. (1997). Sequestration of Hydrophobic Organic Contaminants by Geosorbents. Environmental Science & Technology. 31(12). 3341–3347.838 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Huang, Jianwei, Jianjun Chen, William R. Berti, & Scott D. Cunningham. (1997). Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils: Role of Synthetic Chelates in Lead Phytoextraction. Environmental Science & Technology. 31(3). 800–805.709 indexed citations breakdown →
Cunningham, Scott D. & David W. Ow. (1996). Promises and Prospects of Phytoremediation. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 110(3). 715–719.657 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Huang, Jianwei & Scott D. Cunningham. (1996). Lead phytoextraction: species variation in lead uptake and translocation. New Phytologist. 134(1). 75–84.472 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Cunningham, Scott D., et al.. (1995). Remediation of contaminated soils and sludges by green plants. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).43 indexed citations
11.
Cunningham, Scott D., William R. Berti, & Jianwei Huang. (1995). Phytoremediation of contaminated soils. Trends in biotechnology. 13(9). 393–397.663 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Stomp, Anne-Marie, Kyung‐Hwan Han, Sibylle Wilbert, Milton P. Gordon, & Scott D. Cunningham. (1994). Genetic Strategies for Enhancing Phytoremediation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 721(1). 481–491.39 indexed citations
13.
Berti, William R. & Scott D. Cunningham. (1994). Remediating soil lead with green plants. 43–51.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.