Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Sequestration of Hydrophobic Organic Contaminants by Geosorbents
1997838 citationsRichard G. Luthy, George R. Aiken et al.Environmental Science & Technologyprofile →
Transport of nonpolar organic compounds from surface water to groundwater. Laboratory sorption studies
1981665 citationsRené P. Schwarzenbach, John C. WestallEnvironmental Science & Technologyprofile →
A comparison of electrostatic models for the oxide/solution interface
Countries citing papers authored by John C. Westall
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Westall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Westall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Westall more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Westall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Westall. The network helps show where John C. Westall may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John C. Westall
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John C. Westall.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John C. Westall based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John C. Westall. John C. Westall is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Reimers, Clare E., Peter R. Girguis, John C. Westall, et al.. (2005). Using electrochemical methods to study redox processes and harvest energy from marine sediments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta Supplement. 69(10).6 indexed citations
Westall, John C., et al.. (1999). THE STUDY OF CHLORIDE ION MIGRATION IN REINFORCED CONCRETE UNDER CATHODIC PROTECTION.3 indexed citations
5.
Scherer, Michelle M., John C. Westall, & Paul G. Tratnyek. (1997). An electrochemical interpretation of carbon tetrachloride reduction at an oxide-free iron electrode. 37(2). 247–248.1 indexed citations
6.
Luthy, Richard G., George R. Aiken, Mark L. Brusseau, et al.. (1997). Sequestration of Hydrophobic Organic Contaminants by Geosorbents. Environmental Science & Technology. 31(12). 3341–3347.838 indexed citations breakdown →
Scherer, Michelle M., John C. Westall, & Paul G. Tratnyek. (1997). Kinetics of carbon tetrachloride reduction at an iron rotating disk electrode. 37(1). 85–86.1 indexed citations
Giger, Walter, et al.. (1983). Das Verhalten organischer Wasserinhaltsstoffe bei der Grundwasserbildung und im Grundwasser. DORA Eawag (Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag)).2 indexed citations
19.
Morel, François M. M., et al.. (1981). Adsorption models: A mathematical analysis in the framework of general equilibrium calculations.26 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.