Scott C. Fish

430 citations
9 papers · 311 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Scott C. Fish

9 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers

Scott C. Fish
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 202
  • Philosophy 69
  • Biological Psychiatry 12
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 62
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 86
Replace Janelle M. Caponigro with:
Janelle M. Caponigro United States
Stacey L. Eckert United States
Sarah Byrne Australia
Roderick Calkins United States
Caroline Demro United States
James C. Seltzer United States
Rachael Spooner Australia
Yun Young Song South Korea
Adegboyega Sapara Canada
P. Prosperini Italy
Scott C. Fish relative to Janelle M. Caponigro United States Janelle M. Caponigro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Janelle M. Caponigro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott C. Fish

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott C. Fish's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott C. Fish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott C. Fish more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott C. Fish

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott C. Fish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott C. Fish. The network helps show where Scott C. Fish may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Scott C. Fish, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott C. Fish Line = papers co-authored together Scott C. Fish links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2010157
2 200842
3 201441
4 201031
5 200918
6 200817
7 20153
8 20091
9 20031

About Scott C. Fish

Scott C. Fish is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Philosophy, having authored 9 papers that have together received 311 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (1 paper), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper) and Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (202 citations), Philosophy (69 citations), Biological Psychiatry (12 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (62 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (86 citations). Scott C. Fish has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Eric Granholm, Shannon M. Couture, Rowena Ng, Dilip V. Jeste, Peter Link, John R. McQuaid, Thomas L. Patterson, Steven P. Verney, Helena C. Kraemer and David R. Topor. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Neuropsychology, Psychophysiology and Women & Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact