Scott Bloom

915 citations
19 papers · 695 indexed · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Scott Bloom

15 papers receiving 641 citations

Peers

Scott Bloom
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 524
  • Instrumentation 24
  • Aerospace Engineering 161
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 166
  • Ophthalmology 41
Replace Mike S. Ferraro with:
Mike S. Ferraro United States
M. Bitter Germany
D.A. Kozlowski United Kingdom
V. S. Rao Gudimetla United States
Jiankun Yang China
Federico Dios Spain
A. Amorim Portugal
Melanie N. Ott United States
H. Hodara United States
Scott Bloom relative to Mike S. Ferraro United States Mike S. Ferraro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mike S. Ferraro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Bloom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Bloom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Bloom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Bloom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Bloom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Bloom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Bloom. The network helps show where Scott Bloom may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Bloom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Bloom Line = papers co-authored together Scott Bloom links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2003483
2 199190
3 200638
4 199121
5 199319
6 199817
7 19956
8 19954
9 19904
10 19963
11 19852
12 20022
13
Spare the Rod, Spoil the Child? A Legal Framework for Recent Corporal Punishment Proposals
19951
14 19961
15 20061
16 20071
17 19931
18 19951
19 20060

About Scott Bloom

Scott Bloom is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Ophthalmology, Radiation, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 695 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optical Wireless Communication Technologies (8 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (6 papers), Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (4 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (3 papers), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (2 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (2 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (2 papers) and Laser Design and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (524 citations), Instrumentation (24 citations), Aerospace Engineering (161 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (166 citations) and Ophthalmology (41 citations). Scott Bloom has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include Eric J. Korevaar, H. Willebrand, John J. Schuster, K. Benson, Richard M. Kremer, Srikanth V. Krishnamurthy, A.S. Acampora, O. Hemberg, G. Vaschenko and David Attwood. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Letters, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Journal of Optical Networking, Economics Letters and Golden Gate University law review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026