Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of David Attwood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Attwood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Attwood more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Attwood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Attwood. The network helps show where David Attwood may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Attwood
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Attwood.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Attwood based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Attwood. David Attwood is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Sweeney, Donald W., David Attwood, & L. W. Coleman. (2012). Interferometric reconstruction of electron number densities in laser- induced plasmas. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).
Zhang, X., Ariel Paul, Daisy Raymondson, et al.. (2004). High-resolution EUV imaging using high harmonic generation. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics. 1. 946–947.
5.
Goldberg, Kenneth A., Patrick Naulleau, Senajith Rekawa, et al.. (2003). At-wavelength interferometry of high-NA diffraction-limited EUV optics. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).1 indexed citations
Chang, Chang, Erik H. Anderson, Patrick Naulleau, et al.. (2001). Direct index of refraction measurement at extreme ultraviolet wavelength region with a novel interferometer. Optics Letters. 27(12).1 indexed citations
8.
Meyer‐Ilse, W., Tony Warwick, & David Attwood. (2000). X-ray microscopy : proceedings of the 6th International Conference, Berkeley, CA, 2-6 Aug. 1999. American Institute of Physics eBooks.1 indexed citations
Meyer‐Ilse, W., Mario M. Moronne, C Magowan, et al.. (1994). Techniques and Applications of X-ray Microscopy. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 33(4). 42–52.1 indexed citations
Attwood, David, et al.. (1989). X-Ray Microimaging for the Life Sciences, Proceedings of the Workshop. eScholarship (California Digital Library).1 indexed citations
Attwood, David, et al.. (1986). Short wavelength coherent radiation : generation and applications : Monterey, CA 1986. American Institute of Physics eBooks.1 indexed citations
18.
Kirz, Janos, David Attwood, B. L. Henke, et al.. (1986). Center for X-ray Optics, X-ray Data Booklet. eScholarship (California Digital Library).13 indexed citations
19.
Attwood, David. (1985). Report of the Workshop on an Advanced Soft X-ray and Ultraviolet Synchrotron Source: Applications to Science and Technology. eScholarship (California Digital Library).2 indexed citations
20.
Басов, Н. Г., et al.. (1980). Numerical processing of interferograms of highly inhomogeneous phase objects. 6. 1167–1173.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.