Scott A. Shalkowski

613 total citations
16 papers, 228 citations indexed

About

Scott A. Shalkowski is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Scott A. Shalkowski has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 228 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 6 papers in History and Philosophy of Science and 6 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Scott A. Shalkowski's work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (9 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers) and Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (3 papers). Scott A. Shalkowski is often cited by papers focused on Philosophy and Theoretical Science (9 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers) and Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (3 papers). Scott A. Shalkowski collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Scott A. Shalkowski's co-authors include Otávio Bueno, Michael Jubien and Jacob Busch and has published in prestigious journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

In The Last Decade

Scott A. Shalkowski

15 papers receiving 195 citations

Peers

Scott A. Shalkowski

ECP

PHILO

HPS

AI

CTM

E. J. Lowe

David Lewis United States

Bradley Armour‐Garb United States

Stephan Leuenberger United Kingdom

Salvatore Florio United States

Igal Kvart Israel

Josh Parsons United Kingdom

Boris Kment United States

Michael Jubien United States

David Liggins United Kingdom

E. J. Lowe

Scott A. Shalkowski

126 ×0.8

ECP

109 ×0.8

PHILO

85 ×0.8

HPS

32 ×0.8

AI

11 ×0.6

CTM

Citations per year, relative to Scott A. Shalkowski Scott A. Shalkowski (= 1×) peers E. J. Lowe

Countries citing papers authored by Scott A. Shalkowski

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott A. Shalkowski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott A. Shalkowski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott A. Shalkowski more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott A. Shalkowski

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott A. Shalkowski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott A. Shalkowski. The network helps show where Scott A. Shalkowski may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott A. Shalkowski

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott A. Shalkowski. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott A. Shalkowski based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott A. Shalkowski. Scott A. Shalkowski is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

16 of 16 papers shown

1.

Bueno, Otávio & Scott A. Shalkowski. (2019). Troubles with Theoretical Virtues: Resisting Theoretical Utility Arguments in Metaphysics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 101(2). 456–469. 10 indexed citations

2.

Bueno, Otávio, Jacob Busch, & Scott A. Shalkowski. (2015). The No-Category Ontology. The Monist. 98(3). 233–245. 4 indexed citations

3.

Bueno, Otávio & Scott A. Shalkowski. (2014). Modalism and theoretical virtues: toward an epistemology of modality. Philosophical Studies. 172(3). 671–689. 28 indexed citations

4.

Bueno, Otávio & Scott A. Shalkowski. (2013). Logical Constants: A Modalist Approach¹. Noûs. 47(1). 1–24. 18 indexed citations

5.

Bueno, Otávio & Scott A. Shalkowski. (2009). Modalism and Logical Pluralism. Mind. 118(470). 295–321. 37 indexed citations

6.

Shalkowski, Scott A.. (2008). Essence and Being. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. 62. 49–63. 4 indexed citations

7.

Shalkowski, Scott A.. (2008). Blackburn’s Rejection of Modals. Philosophia Scientae. 12-1. 93–106.

8.

Shalkowski, Scott A.. (2004). Logic and Absolute Necessity. The Journal of Philosophy. 101(2). 55–82. 15 indexed citations

9.

Bueno, Otávio & Scott A. Shalkowski. (2004). Modal realism and modal epistemology: A huge gap. 6 indexed citations

10.

Bueno, Otávio & Scott A. Shalkowski. (2000). A plea for a modal realist epistemology. Acta Analytica. 15(24). 6 indexed citations

11.

Shalkowski, Scott A.. (1997). Essentialism and Absolute Necessity. Acta Analytica. 12(19). 5 indexed citations

12.

Shalkowski, Scott A.. (1997). Theoretical virtues and theological construction. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. 41(2). 71–89. 1 indexed citations

13.

Shalkowski, Scott A.. (1996). Conventions, cognitivism, and necessity. American Philosophical Quarterly. 33(4). 375–392. 7 indexed citations

14.

Shalkowski, Scott A. & Michael Jubien. (1995). Ontology, Modality, and the Fallacy of Reference.. The Philosophical Review. 104(4). 630–630. 58 indexed citations

15.

Shalkowski, Scott A.. (1994). The Ontological Ground of the Alethic Modality. The Philosophical Review. 103(4). 669–669. 28 indexed citations

16.

Shalkowski, Scott A.. (1992). Supervenience and causal necessity. Synthese. 90(1). 55–87. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact