Scott A. Pugh
- Insect Science top 10%
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies 5
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Forest Management and Policy 4
- Fire effects on ecosystems 2
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 2
- Forest ecology and management 2
-
- Forest Insect Ecology and Management 4
-
- Plant and Fungal Interactions Research 2
-
- Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Randall S. MorinAndrew M. LiebholdCharles H. PerryPatrick D. MilesSusan J. CrockerXiang ZhangBogdan BogdanovMark Libardoni
- Journals
- Analytical Chemistry (1 paper)Canadian Journal of Forest Research (1 paper)Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Scott A. Pugh
10 papers receiving 264 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Insect Science 81
- Global and Planetary Change 138
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 51
- Ecology 107
- Spectroscopy 55
Countries citing papers authored by Scott A. Pugh
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott A. Pugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott A. Pugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott A. Pugh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott A. Pugh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott A. Pugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott A. Pugh. The network helps show where Scott A. Pugh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Scott A. Pugh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 41 | |
| 5 | A regional assessment of emerald ash borer impacts in the Eastern United States: ash mortality and abundance trends in time and space | 2015 | 3 |
| 6 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 48 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 67 | |
| 9 | Forest resources of the United States, 2007: a technical document supporting the forest service 2010 RPA Assessment. | 2009 | 78 |
| 10 | Applying Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis to Evaluate Error in New England Forest-Cover-Type Maps Derived from Landsat Thematic Mapper Data | 2001 | 16 |
About Scott A. Pugh
Scott A. Pugh is a scholar working on Insect Science, Endocrinology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 10 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (5 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (4 papers), Forest Management and Policy (4 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers), Forest ecology and management (2 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (2 papers), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (2 papers) and Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (81 citations), Global and Planetary Change (138 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (51 citations). Scott A. Pugh has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Randall S. Morin, Andrew M. Liebhold, Charles H. Perry, Patrick D. Miles, Susan J. Crocker, Xiang Zhang, Bogdan Bogdanov, Mark Libardoni, Bing Wang and Aiqin Fang. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Canadian Journal of Forest Research and Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.