Scott A. Fabricant
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Genetics
- Global and Planetary Change
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Marie E. HerbersteinKate D. L. UmbersAinsley E. SeagoFelipe M. GawryszewskiCarolynn L. SmithAlice ExnerováPavel ŠtysKatherine L. Barry
- Topics
- Plant and animal studies (6 papers)Animal Behavior and Reproduction (6 papers)Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsCellular and Molecular NeuroscienceInsect Science
- Journals
- PLoS ONEBiological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical SocietyAnimal Behaviour
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesCzechia
In The Last Decade
Scott A. Fabricant
11 papers receiving 288 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 215
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 69
- Genetics 68
- Global and Planetary Change 52
- Social Psychology 37
Countries citing papers authored by Scott A. Fabricant
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott A. Fabricant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott A. Fabricant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott A. Fabricant more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott A. Fabricant
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott A. Fabricant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott A. Fabricant. The network helps show where Scott A. Fabricant may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott A. Fabricant
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott A. Fabricant. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott A. Fabricant based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott A. Fabricant. Scott A. Fabricant is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 37 | |
| 6 | 36 | |
| 7 | 97 | |
| 8 | 32 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 29 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 2 |
About Scott A. Fabricant
Scott A. Fabricant is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Insect Science, having authored 12 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (6 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (215 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (69 citations) and Insect Science (36 citations). Scott A. Fabricant has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Marie E. Herberstein, Kate D. L. Umbers, Ainsley E. Seago, Felipe M. Gawryszewski, Carolynn L. Smith, Alice Exnerová, Pavel Štys, Katherine L. Barry, Thomas E. White and Zuzana Bosáková. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society and Animal Behaviour.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.