Saskia de Vries

3.2k total citations
24 papers, 793 citations indexed

About

Saskia de Vries is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Saskia de Vries has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 793 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 10 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 7 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Saskia de Vries's work include Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (8 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (7 papers). Saskia de Vries is often cited by papers focused on Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (8 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (7 papers). Saskia de Vries collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Sweden. Saskia de Vries's co-authors include Th. Mulder, Thomas R. Clandinin, Markus Meister, Maria N. Geffen, R. Clay Reid, Ramakrishnan Iyer, Ştefan Mihalaş, Séverine Durand, Kenji Mizuseki and Jérôme Lecoq and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Nature Methods and Current Biology.

In The Last Decade

Saskia de Vries

23 papers receiving 772 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Saskia de Vries United States 10 471 386 151 91 68 24 793
Ashesh K. Dhawale United States 9 835 1.8× 538 1.4× 51 0.3× 38 0.4× 126 1.9× 10 1.2k
Maik C. Stüttgen Germany 20 1.1k 2.2× 753 2.0× 117 0.8× 12 0.1× 178 2.6× 48 1.5k
Roberto Bermejo United States 15 667 1.4× 494 1.3× 50 0.3× 18 0.2× 94 1.4× 23 1.0k
Andrew J. Peters United States 12 1.1k 2.3× 724 1.9× 146 1.0× 18 0.2× 55 0.8× 18 1.5k
Simon Musall Germany 14 877 1.9× 567 1.5× 111 0.7× 14 0.2× 48 0.7× 27 1.2k
Alfred J. Szumski United States 12 448 1.0× 379 1.0× 241 1.6× 22 0.2× 98 1.4× 24 1.2k
Pingbo Yin United States 20 1.1k 2.3× 212 0.5× 57 0.4× 6 0.1× 135 2.0× 34 1.3k
Jeanette Hellgren Sweden 6 316 0.7× 319 0.8× 93 0.6× 7 0.1× 66 1.0× 6 699
Ari Berkowitz United States 17 343 0.7× 288 0.7× 77 0.5× 7 0.1× 44 0.6× 42 859
Steffen Schneider Germany 8 148 0.3× 82 0.2× 64 0.4× 11 0.1× 99 1.5× 17 680

Countries citing papers authored by Saskia de Vries

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Saskia de Vries's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Saskia de Vries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Saskia de Vries more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Saskia de Vries

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Saskia de Vries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Saskia de Vries. The network helps show where Saskia de Vries may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Saskia de Vries

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Saskia de Vries. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Saskia de Vries based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Saskia de Vries. Saskia de Vries is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ledochowitsch, Peter, et al.. (2023). Saccade-Responsive Visual Cortical Neurons Do Not Exhibit Distinct Visual Response Properties. eNeuro. 10(9). ENEURO.0051–23.2023. 1 indexed citations
2.
Vries, Saskia de, Joshua H. Siegle, & Christof Koch. (2023). Sharing neurophysiology data from the Allen Brain Observatory. eLife. 12. 9 indexed citations
3.
Lee, Eric, Saskia de Vries, Shiella Caldejon, et al.. (2022). A Standardized Nonvisual Behavioral Event Is Broadcasted Homogeneously across Cortical Visual Areas without Modulating Visual Responses. eNeuro. 9(5). ENEURO.0491–21.2022. 2 indexed citations
4.
Waters, Jack, et al.. (2021). The Effect of Inclusion Criteria on the Functional Properties Reported in Mouse Visual Cortex. eNeuro. 8(1). ENEURO.0188–20.2021. 6 indexed citations
5.
Cline, Hollis T., Lique M. Coolen, Saskia de Vries, et al.. (2020). Recognizing Team Science Contributions in Academic Hiring, Promotion, and Tenure. Journal of Neuroscience. 40(35). 6662–6663. 6 indexed citations
6.
Millman, Daniel, Gabriel Koch Ocker, Shiella Caldejon, et al.. (2020). VIP interneurons in mouse primary visual cortex selectively enhance responses to weak but specific stimuli. eLife. 9. 39 indexed citations
7.
Groblewski, Peter A., David Sullivan, Jérôme Lecoq, et al.. (2020). A standardized head-fixation system for performing large-scale, in vivo physiological recordings in mice. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 346. 108922–108922. 8 indexed citations
8.
Liu, Rui, Leonard Kuan, Daniel Millman, et al.. (2019). Aberration-free multi-plane imaging of neural activity from the mammalian brain using a fast-switching liquid crystal spatial light modulator. Biomedical Optics Express. 10(10). 5059–5059. 13 indexed citations
9.
Vries, Saskia de, et al.. (2019). The Fair Open Access Breakdown of Publication Services and Fees. Lincoln (University of Nebraska). 1 indexed citations
10.
Durand, Séverine, Ramakrishnan Iyer, Kenji Mizuseki, et al.. (2016). A Comparison of Visual Response Properties in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus and Primary Visual Cortex of Awake and Anesthetized Mice. Journal of Neuroscience. 36(48). 12144–12156. 92 indexed citations
11.
Veen, G. F., Saskia de Vries, Elisabeth S. Bakker, Wim H. van der Putten, & Han Olff. (2014). Grazing‐induced changes in plant–soil feedback alter plant biomass allocation. Oikos. 123(7). 800–806. 51 indexed citations
12.
Vries, Saskia de, et al.. (2013). Optogenetic Stimulation of Escape Behavior in <em>Drosophila melanogaster</em>. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 16 indexed citations
13.
Vries, Saskia de, et al.. (2013). Optogenetic Stimulation of Escape Behavior in <em>Drosophila melanogaster</em>. Journal of Visualized Experiments.
14.
Vries, Saskia de & Thomas R. Clandinin. (2012). Loom-Sensitive Neurons Link Computation to Action in the Drosophila Visual System. Current Biology. 22(5). 353–362. 104 indexed citations
15.
Vries, Saskia de, Stephen A. Baccus, & Markus Meister. (2011). The Projective Field of a Retinal Amacrine Cell. Journal of Neuroscience. 31(23). 8595–8604. 25 indexed citations
16.
Clark, Damon A., Saskia de Vries, & Thomas R. Clandinin. (2010). Watching the fly brain in action. Nature Methods. 7(7). 505–506. 1 indexed citations
17.
Geffen, Maria N., Saskia de Vries, & Markus Meister. (2007). Retinal Ganglion Cells Can Rapidly Change Polarity from Off to On. PLoS Biology. 5(3). e65–e65. 84 indexed citations
18.
Vries, Saskia de & Th. Mulder. (2007). Motor imagery and stroke rehabilitation: a critical discussion. Acta Dermato Venereologica. 39(1). 5–13. 233 indexed citations
19.
Geffen, Maria N., Saskia de Vries, & Markus Meister. (2007). Correction: Retinal Ganglion Cells Can Rapidly Change Polarity from Off to On. PLoS Biology. 5(7). e188–e188. 8 indexed citations
20.
Geffen, Maria N., Saskia de Vries, & Markus Meister. (2007). Correction: Retinal Ganglion Cells Can Rapidly Change Polarity from Off to On. PLoS Biology. 5(5). e136–e136. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026