G. F. Veen

5.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
78 papers, 3.5k citations indexed

About

G. F. Veen is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, G. F. Veen has authored 78 papers receiving a total of 3.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 34 papers in Ecology and 34 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in G. F. Veen's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (34 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (26 papers) and Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (24 papers). G. F. Veen is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (34 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (26 papers) and Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (24 papers). G. F. Veen collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Sweden and China. G. F. Veen's co-authors include Wim H. van der Putten, David A. Wardle, Paul Kardol, Mark A. Bradford, E. Pernilla Brinkman, Tess F. J. van de Voorde, Elisabeth S. Bakker, Grégoire T. Freschet, Jonathan R. De Long and Han Olff and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

G. F. Veen

74 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Hit Papers

Where, when and how plant–soil feedback matters in a chan... 2016 2026 2019 2022 2016 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
G. F. Veen Netherlands 31 1.5k 1.3k 1.2k 1.2k 613 78 3.5k
Kate H. Orwin New Zealand 26 1.1k 0.7× 975 0.8× 1.0k 0.8× 1.1k 1.0× 502 0.8× 50 2.9k
Juha Mikola Finland 31 1.2k 0.8× 862 0.7× 953 0.8× 1.1k 0.9× 720 1.2× 88 3.2k
Alexandru Milcu France 30 1.0k 0.7× 1.3k 1.0× 875 0.7× 1.4k 1.2× 704 1.1× 58 3.1k
Stephanie N. Kivlin United States 28 2.2k 1.5× 893 0.7× 992 0.8× 1.1k 0.9× 853 1.4× 72 3.6k
Daniel S. Maynard United States 27 1.2k 0.8× 851 0.7× 1.5k 1.2× 1.3k 1.1× 701 1.1× 42 3.7k
Madhav P. Thakur Switzerland 30 1.1k 0.7× 764 0.6× 1.1k 0.9× 1.1k 0.9× 719 1.2× 76 3.1k
Martin Schädler Germany 35 1.5k 1.0× 929 0.7× 922 0.7× 907 0.8× 1.1k 1.8× 112 3.4k
Anita C. Risch Switzerland 33 843 0.6× 1.1k 0.8× 1.6k 1.3× 1.1k 0.9× 983 1.6× 105 3.6k
Nina Wurzburger United States 25 1.2k 0.8× 815 0.6× 773 0.6× 1.1k 0.9× 334 0.5× 54 2.6k
Simone Cesarz Germany 31 1.2k 0.8× 730 0.6× 927 0.7× 1.3k 1.1× 489 0.8× 69 2.7k

Countries citing papers authored by G. F. Veen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. F. Veen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. F. Veen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. F. Veen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. F. Veen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. F. Veen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. F. Veen. The network helps show where G. F. Veen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. F. Veen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. F. Veen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. F. Veen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. F. Veen. G. F. Veen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Veen, G. F., Wim H. van der Putten, Xiaojuan Liu, et al.. (2025). Non‐random tree species loss shifts soil fungal communities. Journal of Ecology. 113(5). 1239–1255. 1 indexed citations
2.
Putten, Wim H. van der, et al.. (2025). Effects of crop species on soil functions and soil multifunctionality are species‐specific. Functional Ecology. 39(9). 2354–2369.
3.
Elsen, Sven van den, et al.. (2025). Protist size-dependent shifts of bacterial communities can reduce litter decomposition. ISME Communications. 5(1). ycaf231–ycaf231.
4.
Rijssel, Sophie Q. van, et al.. (2024). Impact of soil inoculation on crop residue breakdown and carbon and nitrogen cycling in organically and conventionally managed agricultural soils. Applied Soil Ecology. 205. 105760–105760. 2 indexed citations
5.
Ripoll‐Bosch, R., et al.. (2024). The effect of alternative agricultural practices on soil biodiversity of bacteria, fungi, nematodes and earthworms: A review. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 379. 109329–109329. 4 indexed citations
6.
Marselis, Suzanne, S. Emilia Hannula, Krijn B. Trimbos, et al.. (2024). The use of living labs to advance agro-ecological theory in the transition towards sustainable land use: A tale of two polders. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 108. 107588–107588. 7 indexed citations
7.
Zhu, Yu, Quanhui Ma, Zhiwei Zhong, et al.. (2023). Contrasting effects of nitrogen fertiliser application on the performance of closely related grasshoppers through changes in plant nutrient concentrations. Ecological Entomology. 48(3). 347–357. 8 indexed citations
9.
Veen, G. F., Robin Heinen, Deli Wang, et al.. (2023). Large mammalian herbivores affect arthropod food webs via changes in vegetation characteristics and microclimate. Journal of Ecology. 111(9). 2077–2089. 16 indexed citations
10.
Li, Bing, Yingbin Li, Yingbin Li, et al.. (2023). Stoichiometric imbalances between soil microorganisms and their resources regulate litter decomposition. Functional Ecology. 37(12). 3136–3149. 5 indexed citations
12.
Rijssel, Sophie Q. van, G. F. Veen, J. M. Tanja Bakx‐Schotman, et al.. (2022). Soil microbial diversity and community composition during conversion from conventional to organic agriculture. Molecular Ecology. 31(15). 4017–4030. 30 indexed citations
13.
Veen, G. F., Freddy C. ten Hooven, Carolin Weser, & S. Emilia Hannula. (2021). Steering the soil microbiome by repeated litter addition. Journal of Ecology. 109(6). 2499–2513. 31 indexed citations
14.
Fanin, Nicolas, Dunmei Lin, Grégoire T. Freschet, et al.. (2021). Home‐field advantage of litter decomposition: from the phyllosphere to the soil. New Phytologist. 231(4). 1353–1358. 85 indexed citations
15.
Yao, Zhongyuan, et al.. (2021). The role of soil-borne fungi in driving the coexistence ofPinus massonianaandLithocarpus glaberin a subtropical forest via plant–soil feedback. Journal of Plant Ecology. 14(6). 1189–1203. 5 indexed citations
16.
Barceló, Milagros, Peter M. van Bodegom, Leho Tedersoo, et al.. (2020). The abundance of arbuscular mycorrhiza in soils is linked to the total length of roots colonized at ecosystem level. PLoS ONE. 15(9). e0237256–e0237256. 33 indexed citations
17.
Geisen, Stefan, et al.. (2020). Protists as catalyzers of microbial litter breakdown and carbon cycling at different temperature regimes. The ISME Journal. 15(2). 618–621. 105 indexed citations
18.
He, Xianjin, Enqing Hou, G. F. Veen, et al.. (2019). Soil microbial biomass increases along elevational gradients in the tropics and subtropics but not elsewhere. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 29(2). 345–354. 46 indexed citations
19.
Putten, Wim H. van der, Carolin Weser, Freddy C. ten Hooven, et al.. (2019). Soil functional responses to drought under range‐expanding and native plant communities. Functional Ecology. 33(12). 2402–2416. 17 indexed citations
20.
Bradford, Mark A., G. F. Veen, Anne Bonis, et al.. (2017). A test of the hierarchical model of litter decomposition. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 1(12). 1836–1845. 198 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026