Sascha Hölig
- Communication top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Literature and Literary Theory
- Gender Studies
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Uwe HasebrinkWiebke LoosenJulius ReimerKlaus Bruhn JensenPieter MaeseeleHilde Van den BulckJan SchmidtL. Merten
- Topics
- Media Studies and Communication (11 papers)Social Media and Politics (10 papers)Media Influence and Politics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- DenmarkUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Sascha Hölig
21 papers receiving 152 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Communication 141
- Sociology and Political Science 92
- Literature and Literary Theory 18
- Gender Studies 17
- Artificial Intelligence 14
Countries citing papers authored by Sascha Hölig
This map shows the geographic impact of Sascha Hölig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sascha Hölig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sascha Hölig more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sascha Hölig
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sascha Hölig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sascha Hölig. The network helps show where Sascha Hölig may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sascha Hölig
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sascha Hölig. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sascha Hölig based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sascha Hölig. Sascha Hölig is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 28 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 52 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | Caught in a feedback loop? Algorithmic personalization and digital traces | 1 |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | Media Audiences|Changing Patterns of Media Use across Cultures: A Challenge for Longitudinal Research | 5 |
| 18 | Changing patterns of media use across cultures : a challenge for longitudinal research | 16 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Sascha Hölig
Sascha Hölig is a scholar working on Communication, Gender Studies and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 22 papers that have together received 172 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Studies and Communication (11 papers), Social Media and Politics (10 papers) and Media Influence and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (141 citations), Sociology and Political Science (92 citations) and Gender Studies (17 citations). Sascha Hölig has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Uwe Hasebrink, Wiebke Loosen, Julius Reimer, Klaus Bruhn Jensen, Pieter Maeseele, Hilde Van den Bulck, Jan Schmidt, L. Merten, Kim Christian Schrøder and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. Their work appears in journals such as New Media & Society, Journalism Studies and Journalism.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.