Sarah Wolff

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Sarah Wolff is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Economics and Econometrics and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Wolff has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 3 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 2 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Sarah Wolff's work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (8 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (6 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers). Sarah Wolff is often cited by papers focused on Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (8 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (6 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers). Sarah Wolff collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Sarah Wolff's co-authors include Catharina J.E. Schulp, Peter H. Verburg, Thomas Kästner, Aletta Bonn, Jianguo Liu, Laura López‐Hoffman, Matthias Schröter, Kenneth J. Bagstad, Alexandra Marques and Berta Martín‐López and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecological Economics, Global Environmental Change and Ecological Indicators.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Wolff

9 papers receiving 992 citations

Hit Papers

Mapping ecosystem service... 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Wolff Netherlands 9 883 248 220 172 142 9 1.0k
Rocco Scolozzi Italy 16 710 0.8× 170 0.7× 205 0.9× 210 1.2× 186 1.3× 33 981
Nachuan Lu China 9 753 0.9× 174 0.7× 233 1.1× 151 0.9× 112 0.8× 12 884
Alejandra Carmona Chile 14 788 0.9× 139 0.6× 148 0.7× 200 1.2× 147 1.0× 19 1.0k
Zuzana V. Harmáčková Czechia 13 618 0.7× 149 0.6× 143 0.7× 115 0.7× 175 1.2× 29 810
Janina Kleemann Germany 15 673 0.8× 102 0.4× 133 0.6× 158 0.9× 145 1.0× 32 914
L.C. Braat Netherlands 10 886 1.0× 293 1.2× 157 0.7× 177 1.0× 306 2.2× 25 1.1k
Ken Wallace Australia 13 739 0.8× 278 1.1× 135 0.6× 179 1.0× 219 1.5× 20 1.0k
Joanna Endter‐Wada United States 18 457 0.5× 134 0.5× 197 0.9× 171 1.0× 172 1.2× 48 987
Jesse D. Gourevitch United States 17 538 0.6× 223 0.9× 83 0.4× 152 0.9× 98 0.7× 19 864
Simone Maynard Australia 12 689 0.8× 124 0.5× 166 0.8× 202 1.2× 237 1.7× 18 981

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Wolff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Wolff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Wolff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Wolff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Wolff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Wolff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Wolff. The network helps show where Sarah Wolff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Wolff

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Wolff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Wolff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Wolff. Sarah Wolff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Wolff, Sarah & Jörg Schweinle. (2022). Effectiveness and Economic Viability of Forest Certification: A Systematic Review. Forests. 13(5). 798–798. 23 indexed citations
2.
Landín, Germán Arana, et al.. (2022). Assessing the economic impacts of forest certification in Spain: A longitudinal study. Ecological Economics. 204. 107630–107630. 11 indexed citations
3.
Kleemann, Janina, Matthias Schröter, Kenneth J. Bagstad, et al.. (2020). Quantifying interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services – A case study for Germany. Global Environmental Change. 61. 102051–102051. 80 indexed citations
4.
Wolff, Sarah, Johan R. Meijer, Catharina J.E. Schulp, & Peter H. Verburg. (2020). Contextualizing local landscape initiatives in global change: a scenario study for the high forest zone, Ghana. Regional Environmental Change. 20(4). 11 indexed citations
5.
Bonn, Aletta, Sebastian Arnhold, Kenneth J. Bagstad, et al.. (2019). Guidance for assessing interregional ecosystem service flows. Ecological Indicators. 105. 92–106. 79 indexed citations
6.
Schröter, Matthias, Thomas Koellner, Rob Alkemade, et al.. (2018). Interregional flows of ecosystem services: Concepts, typology and four cases. Ecosystem Services. 31. 231–241. 179 indexed citations
7.
Wolff, Sarah, et al.. (2018). Meeting global land restoration and protection targets: What would the world look like in 2050?. Global Environmental Change. 52. 259–272. 79 indexed citations
8.
Wolff, Sarah, Catharina J.E. Schulp, Thomas Kästner, & Peter H. Verburg. (2017). Quantifying Spatial Variation in Ecosystem Services Demand: A Global Mapping Approach. Ecological Economics. 136. 14–29. 70 indexed citations
9.
Wolff, Sarah, Catharina J.E. Schulp, & Peter H. Verburg. (2015). Mapping ecosystem services demand: A review of current research and future perspectives. Ecological Indicators. 55. 159–171. 490 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026