Sarah Armstrong

2.7k total citations
50 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

Sarah Armstrong is a scholar working on Surgery, General Health Professions and Geriatrics and Gerontology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Armstrong has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Surgery, 10 papers in General Health Professions and 7 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology. Recurrent topics in Sarah Armstrong's work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (5 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (5 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (4 papers). Sarah Armstrong is often cited by papers focused on Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (5 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (5 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (4 papers). Sarah Armstrong collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Sarah Armstrong's co-authors include Hywel C Williams, Anthony Avery, Mara Ozolins, I. Watt, Fiona Bath‐Hextall, Paul S.J. Miller, Graham Colver, William Perkins, Rachel Howard and Matthew Boyd and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, The Lancet Oncology and Ophthalmology.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Armstrong

49 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Armstrong United Kingdom 26 363 308 282 280 275 50 1.8k
Massimo Petruzzi Italy 29 223 0.6× 163 0.5× 239 0.8× 347 1.2× 108 0.4× 131 3.0k
Manuel Bravo Spain 38 67 0.2× 113 0.4× 209 0.7× 308 1.1× 268 1.0× 166 4.3k
Shuji Awano Japan 29 114 0.3× 136 0.4× 160 0.6× 164 0.6× 104 0.4× 92 2.4k
Sumio Akifusa Japan 29 136 0.4× 67 0.2× 270 1.0× 211 0.8× 133 0.5× 98 2.6k
Masanori Iwasaki Japan 31 445 1.2× 100 0.3× 117 0.4× 209 0.7× 86 0.3× 172 3.0k
Simon Holmes United Kingdom 27 76 0.2× 55 0.2× 147 0.5× 521 1.9× 247 0.9× 165 2.3k
David Lora Spain 26 50 0.1× 288 0.9× 676 2.4× 359 1.3× 97 0.4× 148 2.5k
Nortin M. Hadler United States 34 53 0.1× 932 3.0× 212 0.8× 498 1.8× 340 1.2× 91 3.3k
Susan Gordon Australia 28 88 0.2× 108 0.4× 248 0.9× 545 1.9× 195 0.7× 149 2.4k
Henry Milgrom United States 29 28 0.1× 227 0.7× 137 0.5× 186 0.7× 229 0.8× 93 4.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Armstrong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Armstrong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Armstrong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Armstrong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Armstrong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Armstrong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Armstrong. The network helps show where Sarah Armstrong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Armstrong

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Armstrong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Armstrong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Armstrong. Sarah Armstrong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Armstrong, Sarah, et al.. (2018). Femoral Nerve Block Intervention in Neck of Femur Fracture (FINOF): a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 8(4). e019650–e019650. 27 indexed citations
2.
Robinson, Katie, Annabelle Long, Paul Leighton, et al.. (2018). Chair based exercise in community settings: a cluster randomised feasibility study. BMC Geriatrics. 18(1). 82–82. 4 indexed citations
3.
Bell, Brian, Stephen Campbell, Andrew Carson‐Stevens, et al.. (2017). Understanding the epidemiology of avoidable significant harm in primary care: protocol for a retrospective cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 7(2). e013786–e013786. 12 indexed citations
4.
Williams, Hywel C, Fiona Bath‐Hextall, Mara Ozolins, et al.. (2016). Surgery Versus 5% Imiquimod for Nodular and Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma: 5-Year Results of the SINS Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 137(3). 614–619. 78 indexed citations
5.
Mark, Stephen, et al.. (2016). Assessment of Potential Live Kidney Donors and Computed Tomographic Renal Angiograms at Christchurch Hospital. Advances in Urology. 2016. 1–4. 1 indexed citations
6.
Walker, Gemma, Sarah Armstrong, Adam Gordon, et al.. (2015). The Falls In Care Home study: a feasibility randomized controlled trial of the use of a risk assessment and decision support tool to prevent falls in care homes. Clinical Rehabilitation. 30(10). 972–983. 30 indexed citations
7.
Sahota, Opinder, et al.. (2014). Femoral nerve block Intervention in Neck of Femur fracture (FINOF): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 15(1). 189–189. 18 indexed citations
9.
McGuinness, Paul B., Fergus McNeill, & Sarah Armstrong. (2013). The use and impact of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act (1974). Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen.
10.
Ozolins, Mara, Hywel C Williams, Sarah Armstrong, & Fiona Bath‐Hextall. (2010). The SINS trial: A randomised controlled trial of excisional surgery versus imiquimod 5% cream for nodular and superficial basal cell carcinoma. Trials. 11(1). 42–42. 17 indexed citations
11.
Sun, Mingzhu, Paul J. Kingham, Adam J. Reid, et al.. (2009). In vitro and in vivo testing of novel ultrathin PCL and PCL/PLA blend films as peripheral nerve conduit. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 93A(4). 1470–1481. 58 indexed citations
12.
Morris, R., Rowan Harwood, Rachel Baker, et al.. (2006). A comparison of different balance tests in the prediction of falls in older women with vertebral fractures: a cohort study. Age and Ageing. 36(1). 78–83. 51 indexed citations
13.
Cox, Karen, Eleanor Wilson, Antony Arthur, Ruth Elkan, & Sarah Armstrong. (2005). A randomised controlled trial of nurse-managed trial conclusion following early phase cancer trial participation. British Journal of Cancer. 93(1). 41–45. 8 indexed citations
14.
Waites, Ken B., Kay C. Canupp, Sarah Armstrong, & Michael J. DeVivo. (2004). Effect Of Cranberry Extract On Bacteriuria and Pyuria in Persons With Neurogenic Bladder Secondary To Spinal Cord Injury. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 27(1). 35–40. 60 indexed citations
15.
Bhan, A., S A Vernon, Sarah Armstrong, et al.. (2003). Repeatability of ocular blood flow pneumotonometry. Ophthalmology. 110(8). 1551–1554. 12 indexed citations
16.
17.
Read, Robert, et al.. (1996). Relationship between physical signs of elbow dysplasia and radiographic score in growing Rottweilers. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 209(8). 1427–1430. 14 indexed citations
18.
Ghosh, Peter, et al.. (1993). The effects of intraarticular administration of hyaluronan in a model of early osteoarthritis in sheep II. Cartilage composition and proteoglycan metabolism. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism. 22(6). 31–42. 60 indexed citations
19.
20.
Armstrong, Sarah & I. Watt. (1989). Lipoma arborescens of the knee. British Journal of Radiology. 62(734). 178–180. 70 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026