Sarah R. Bray

521 total citations
8 papers, 394 citations indexed

About

Sarah R. Bray is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah R. Bray has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 394 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 3 papers in Ecology and 2 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Sarah R. Bray's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (2 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (2 papers). Sarah R. Bray is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (2 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (2 papers). Sarah R. Bray collaborates with scholars based in United States. Sarah R. Bray's co-authors include Kaoru Kitajima, Michelle C. Mack, Mary A. Arthur, Ryan W. McEwan, David M. Sylvia, Megan L. Larsen, Kenneth J. Locey, Jay T. Lennon, Mario E. Muscarella and Stuart E. Jones and has published in prestigious journals such as Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Soil Biology and Biochemistry and Ecological Applications.

In The Last Decade

Sarah R. Bray

7 papers receiving 386 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Sarah R. Bray United States	6	165	159	142	140	79	8	394
Xiaolong Zhou China	11	120 0.7×	211 1.3×	162 1.1×	125 0.9×	72 0.9×	33	454
Holger Bessler Germany	2	162 1.0×	168 1.1×	158 1.1×	258 1.8×	42 0.5×	2	414
Sarah R. Carrino‐Kyker United States	11	112 0.7×	227 1.4×	88 0.6×	86 0.6×	107 1.4×	30	386
Caitlin I. Looby United States	6	228 1.4×	163 1.0×	66 0.5×	188 1.3×	67 0.8×	6	448
Minggang Wang China	14	96 0.6×	293 1.8×	85 0.6×	167 1.2×	89 1.1×	34	509
Noé Manuel Montaño Mexico	13	86 0.5×	234 1.5×	74 0.5×	136 1.0×	44 0.6×	40	441
Larry M. Feinstein United States	11	251 1.5×	222 1.4×	114 0.8×	135 1.0×	61 0.8×	11	554
Eileen Reid United Kingdom	9	120 0.7×	140 0.9×	62 0.4×	154 1.1×	43 0.5×	11	344
Lan Xu United States	10	98 0.6×	284 1.8×	108 0.8×	77 0.6×	59 0.7×	25	485
Xinyu Xu China	9	86 0.5×	224 1.4×	96 0.7×	109 0.8×	42 0.5×	19	357

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah R. Bray

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah R. Bray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah R. Bray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah R. Bray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah R. Bray

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah R. Bray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah R. Bray. The network helps show where Sarah R. Bray may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah R. Bray

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah R. Bray. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah R. Bray based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah R. Bray. Sarah R. Bray is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Locey, Kenneth J., Mario E. Muscarella, Megan L. Larsen, et al.. (2020). Dormancy dampens the microbial distance–decay relationship. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 375(1798). 20190243–20190243. 49 indexed citations

2.

McEwan, Ryan W., et al.. (2016). Recovery of forest floor diversity after removal of the nonnative, invasive plantEuonymus fortunei¹. The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society. 143(2). 103–116. 12 indexed citations

3.

Bray, Sarah R., et al.. (2016). Thinking deeply about quantitative analysis: Building a Biologist's Toolkit. CourseSource. 3.

4.

Bray, Sarah R., et al.. (2016). Non-native liana, Euonymus fortunei, associated with increased soil nutrients, unique bacterial communities, and faster decomposition rate. Plant Ecology. 218(3). 329–343. 15 indexed citations

5.

Arthur, Mary A., et al.. (2012). The influence of the invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii, on leaf decomposition and microbial community dynamics. Plant Ecology. 213(10). 1571–1582. 81 indexed citations

6.

Bray, Sarah R., Kaoru Kitajima, & Michelle C. Mack. (2012). Temporal dynamics of microbial communities on decomposing leaf litter of 10 plant species in relation to decomposition rate. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 49. 30–37. 174 indexed citations

7.

Bray, Sarah R., et al.. (2007). LONGLEAF PINE SANDHILL SEED BANKS AND SEEDLING EMERGENCE IN RELATION TO TIME SINCE FIRE. 1 indexed citations

8.

Bray, Sarah R., Kaoru Kitajima, & David M. Sylvia. (2003). MYCORRHIZAE DIFFERENTIALLY ALTER GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY, AND COMPETITIVE ABILITY OF AN INVASIVE SHRUB. Ecological Applications. 13(3). 565–574. 62 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact