Sarah Pilgrim
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Mark HarveyJules PrettyDavid J. SmithLeanne C. Cullen‐UnsworthR. K. SinghKay MiltonBill AdamsAnna Tsing
- Topics
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (4 papers)Global Energy and Sustainability Research (2 papers)Environmental Impact and Sustainability (1 paper)
- Cited by
- General Agricultural and Biological SciencesManagement, Monitoring, Policy and LawGlobal and Planetary Change
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Sarah Pilgrim
15 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Global and Planetary Change 276
- Ecology 256
- Plant Science 230
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 163
- Social Psychology 149
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Pilgrim
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Pilgrim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Pilgrim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Pilgrim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Pilgrim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Pilgrim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Pilgrim. The network helps show where Sarah Pilgrim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Pilgrim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Pilgrim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Pilgrim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Pilgrim. Sarah Pilgrim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 327 | |
| 5 | 55 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 63 | |
| 9 | European Biofuels to 2020 and Beyond | 2 |
| 10 | 299 | |
| 11 | Rebuilding Lost Connections: How Revitalisation Projects Contribute to Cultural Continuity and Improve the Environment | 15 |
| 12 | 201 | |
| 13 | 96 | |
| 14 | Hidden harvest or hidden revenue-A local resource use in a remote region of Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia | 11 |
| 15 | 26 |
About Sarah Pilgrim
Sarah Pilgrim is a scholar working on General Energy, Global and Planetary Change and Ecological Modeling, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (4 papers), Global Energy and Sustainability Research (2 papers) and Environmental Impact and Sustainability (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (148 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (163 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (276 citations). Sarah Pilgrim has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Mark Harvey, Jules Pretty, David J. Smith, Leanne C. Cullen‐Unsworth, R. K. Singh, Kay Milton, Bill Adams, Anna Tsing, Simone Athayde and Fikret Berkes. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Environmental Science & Technology and Ecological Applications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.