Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The performance and potential of protected areas
20141.6k citationsJames Watson, Nigel Dudley et al.Natureprofile →
Area-based conservation in the twenty-first century
2020624 citationsSean Maxwell, Victor Cazalis et al.Natureprofile →
Core principles for successfully implementing and upscaling Nature-based Solutions
2019538 citationsNigel Dudley, Stewart Maginnis et al.profile →
This map shows the geographic impact of Nigel Dudley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nigel Dudley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nigel Dudley more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nigel Dudley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nigel Dudley. The network helps show where Nigel Dudley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nigel Dudley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nigel Dudley.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nigel Dudley based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nigel Dudley. Nigel Dudley is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Nagabhatla, Nidhi, Elaine Springgay, & Nigel Dudley. (2018). Forests as nature-based solutions for ensuring urban water security. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 69(250). 43–52.4 indexed citations
Crawhall, N. T., Jonathan S. Davies, Nigel Dudley, et al.. (2017). Conservation de la biodiversité des zones arides. IUCN eBooks.1 indexed citations
10.
Dudley, Nigel, Kent H. Redford, & Sue Stolton. (2014). Áreas bajo protección privada : mirando al futuro. IUCN eBooks.1 indexed citations
11.
Dudley, Nigel, et al.. (2014). Restauración ecológica para áreas protegidas : principios, directrices y buenas prácticas. IUCN eBooks.1 indexed citations
12.
Day, Jon, et al.. (2012). Directrices para la aplicación de las categorías de gestión de áreas protegidas de la UICN en áreas marinas protegidas. IUCN eBooks.5 indexed citations
13.
Lopoukhine, Nikita, N. T. Crawhall, Nigel Dudley, et al.. (2012). Protected areas: providing natural solutions to 21st Century challenges. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(2). 117–131.73 indexed citations
14.
Dudley, Nigel, et al.. (2012). Application des catégories de gestion aux aires protégées : lignes directrices pour les aires marines. IUCN eBooks.1 indexed citations
Leverington, Fiona, José Courrau, Nigel Dudley, Sue Stolton, & Marc Hockings. (2008). Evaluation de l'efficacité : un cadre pour l'évaluation de l'efficacité de la gestion des aires protégées. IUCN eBooks.1 indexed citations
17.
Dudley, Nigel & Sue Stolton. (2008). Defining protected areas : an international conference in Almeria, Spain, May 2007. IUCN eBooks.17 indexed citations
Stolton, Sue, et al.. (1999). Metals from the forests : mining and forest degradation. IUCN eBooks.4 indexed citations
20.
Dudley, Nigel. (1987). Cause for concern : an analysis of air pollution damage and natural habitats.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.