Sarah Perkins
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Ulrike SchmidtRebecca MurphySuzanne WinnJanet TreasureIvan EislerMark BerelowitzSusie FrostSaskia Keville
- Topics
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors (15 papers)Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (12 papers)Impact of Technology on Adolescents (8 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of PsychiatryCochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsThe British Journal of Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
Sarah Perkins
18 papers receiving 845 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Clinical Psychology 802
- Sociology and Political Science 314
- Psychiatry and Mental health 223
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 131
- Applied Psychology 98
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Perkins
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Perkins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Perkins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Perkins more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Perkins
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Perkins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Perkins. The network helps show where Sarah Perkins may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Perkins
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Perkins. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Perkins based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Perkins. Sarah Perkins is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 158 | |
| 7 | 55 | |
| 8 | 46 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 150 | |
| 11 | 62 | |
| 12 | 69 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 84 | |
| 15 | 33 | |
| 16 | 32 | |
| 17 | 71 | |
| 18 | 56 |
About Sarah Perkins
Sarah Perkins is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Family Practice and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 18 papers that have together received 898 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (15 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (12 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (802 citations), Applied Psychology (98 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (223 citations). Sarah Perkins has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ulrike Schmidt, Rebecca Murphy, Suzanne Winn, Janet Treasure, Ivan Eisler, Mark Berelowitz, Susie Frost, Saskia Keville, Mari Jenkins and Eric Johnson‐Sabine. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and The British Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.