Christopher Williams
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ulrike SchmidtJanet TreasureJennifer HouseHelen StartupCalum MunroDeborah GreavesJun ZangMiriam Grover
- Topics
- Digital Mental Health Interventions (9 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers)Eating Disorders and Behaviors (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEBiometrics
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Christopher Williams
39 papers receiving 834 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
- Clinical Psychology 468
- Sociology and Political Science 200
- Applied Psychology 182
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 124
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 104
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Williams. The network helps show where Christopher Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Williams. Christopher Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 84 | |
| 15 | 42 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | Intimate or Childhood Sexual Abuse and Obesity in Kentucky | 0 |
| 18 | 30 | |
| 19 | 30 | |
| 20 | 51 |
About Christopher Williams
Christopher Williams is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Health Informatics, having authored 44 papers that have together received 887 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (9 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (182 citations), Clinical Psychology (468 citations) and Earth-Surface Processes (55 citations). Christopher Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ulrike Schmidt, Janet Treasure, Jennifer House, Helen Startup, Calum Munro, Deborah Greaves, Jun Zang, Miriam Grover, Alison Raby and Daniel Ståhl. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Biometrics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.