Sarah Pearson

836 total citations
22 papers, 482 citations indexed

About

Sarah Pearson is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Pearson has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 482 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 10 papers in Instrumentation and 3 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in Sarah Pearson's work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (14 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (14 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (10 papers). Sarah Pearson is often cited by papers focused on Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (14 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (14 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (10 papers). Sarah Pearson collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Canada. Sarah Pearson's co-authors include Adrian M. Price-Whelan, Kathryn V. Johnston, Laura A. Lopez, Daniel Castro, E. Ramírez-Ruiz, Nitya Kallivayalil, David R. Patton, Gurtina Besla, M. E. Putman and Sabrina Stierwalt and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Astronomy and Astrophysics.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Pearson

20 papers receiving 404 citations

Peers

Sarah Pearson

INSTR

NHEP

SNP

Nataliya Terekhova Russia

Emily Wisnioski Australia

Leindert Boogaard Germany

Alice Concas Germany

M. Talia Italy

Pamela M. Marcum United States

L. Morselli Germany

John R. Weaver Denmark

E. Florido Spain

Ryan F. Trainor United States

Nataliya Terekhova Russia

Sarah Pearson

516 ×1.2

193 ×1.0

INSTR

84 ×1.1

NHEP

9 ×0.6

SNP

12 ×0.9

Citations per year, relative to Sarah Pearson Sarah Pearson (= 1×) peers Nataliya Terekhova

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Pearson

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Pearson

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Pearson. The network helps show where Sarah Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Pearson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Pearson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Pearson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Pearson. Sarah Pearson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Müller, Oliver, M. Rejkuba, Katja Fahrion, et al.. (2025). MUSE observations of dwarf galaxies and a stellar stream in the M 83 group. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 699. A207–A207.

Aganze, Christian, Sarah Pearson, Tjitske Starkenburg, et al.. (2024). Prospects for Detecting Gaps in Globular Cluster Stellar Streams in External Galaxies with the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope. The Astrophysical Journal. 962(2). 151–151. 5 indexed citations

Chamberlain, Katie, Gurtina Besla, Ekta Patel, et al.. (2024). A Physically Motivated Framework to Compare Pair Fractions of Isolated Low- and High-mass Galaxies across Cosmic Time. The Astrophysical Journal. 962(2). 162–162. 5 indexed citations

Seth, Anil C., Jay Strader, David J. Sand, et al.. (2024). Investigating the dark matter halo of NGC 5128 using a discrete dynamical model. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 685. A132–A132. 2 indexed citations

Pearson, Sarah, et al.. (2024). Forecasting the Population of Globular Cluster Streams in Milky Way–type Galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal. 976(1). 54–54. 7 indexed citations

Pearson, Sarah, et al.. (2024). Bar Formation and Destruction in the FIRE-2 Simulations. The Astrophysical Journal. 978(1). 37–37. 7 indexed citations

Johnston, Kathryn V., et al.. (2023). Stream Fanning and Bifurcations: Observable Signatures of Resonances in Stellar Stream Morphology. The Astrophysical Journal. 954(2). 215–215. 6 indexed citations

Sand, David J., Anil C. Seth, Jay Strader, et al.. (2023). New Velocity Measurements of NGC 5128 Globular Clusters Out to 130 kpc: Outer Halo Kinematics, Substructure, and Dynamics*. The Astrophysical Journal. 947(1). 34–34. 6 indexed citations

Pearson, Sarah, Adrian M. Price-Whelan, David W. Hogg, et al.. (2022). Mapping Dark Matter with Extragalactic Stellar Streams: The Case of Centaurus A. The Astrophysical Journal. 941(1). 19–19. 19 indexed citations

10.

Pearson, Sarah, Susan E. Clark, Kathryn V. Johnston, et al.. (2022). The Hough Stream Spotter: A New Method for Detecting Linear Structure in Resolved Stars and Application to the Stellar Halo of M31. The Astrophysical Journal. 926(2). 166–166. 15 indexed citations

11.

Pearson, Sarah & Susan E. Clark. (2021). HSS: The Hough Stream Spotter. Astrophysics Source Code Library. 1 indexed citations

12.

Johnston, Kathryn V., et al.. (2020). Separatrix divergence of stellar streams in galactic potentials. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 501(2). 1791–1802. 15 indexed citations

13.

Besla, Gurtina, David R. Patton, Sabrina Stierwalt, et al.. (2018). The frequency of dwarf galaxy multiples at low redshift in SDSS versus cosmological expectations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 480(3). 3376–3396. 38 indexed citations

14.

Pearson, Sarah, George C. Privon, Gurtina Besla, et al.. (2018). Modelling the baryon cycle in low-mass galaxy encounters: the case of NGC 4490 and NGC 4485. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 480(3). 3069–3090. 28 indexed citations

15.

Privon, George C., Sabrina Stierwalt, David R. Patton, et al.. (2017). A Widespread, Clumpy Starburst in the Isolated Ongoing Dwarf Galaxy Merger dm1647+21. The Astrophysical Journal. 846(1). 74–74. 28 indexed citations

16.

Pearson, Sarah, Adrian M. Price-Whelan, & Kathryn V. Johnston. (2017). Gaps and length asymmetry in the stellar stream Palomar 5 as effects of Galactic bar rotation. Nature Astronomy. 1(9). 633–639. 73 indexed citations

17.

Price-Whelan, Adrian M., Kathryn V. Johnston, Monica Valluri, et al.. (2015). Chaotic dispersal of tidal debris. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 455(1). 1079–1098. 53 indexed citations

18.

Lopez, Laura A., Sarah Pearson, E. Ramírez-Ruiz, et al.. (2013). UNRAVELING THE ORIGIN OF OVERIONIZED PLASMA IN THE GALACTIC SUPERNOVA REMNANT W49B. The Astrophysical Journal. 777(2). 145–145. 23 indexed citations

19.

Lopez, Laura A., E. Ramírez-Ruiz, Daniel Castro, & Sarah Pearson. (2013). THE GALACTIC SUPERNOVA REMNANT W49B LIKELY ORIGINATES FROM A JET-DRIVEN, CORE-COLLAPSE EXPLOSION. The Astrophysical Journal. 764(1). 50–50. 54 indexed citations

20.

Hall, C.J., Elisabeth Schültke, Luigi Rigon, et al.. (2008). Synchrotron-based in vivo tracking of implanted mammalian cells. European Journal of Radiology. 68(3). S156–S159. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact