Sarah Mottram
- Surgery top 2%
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 1%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Mark ComerfordJo NijsFilip StruyfRomain MeeusenSteven TruijenNathalie RousselDylan MorrisseyJean‐Pierre Baeyens
- Topics
- Shoulder Injury and Treatment (21 papers)Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries (16 papers)Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (15 papers)
- Journals
- British Journal of Sports MedicineJournal of Shoulder and Elbow SurgeryEuropean Spine Journal
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBelgiumNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Sarah Mottram
35 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Surgery 1.3k
- Pharmacology 887
- Epidemiology 736
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 465
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 257
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Mottram
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Mottram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Mottram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Mottram more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Mottram
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Mottram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Mottram. The network helps show where Sarah Mottram may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Mottram
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Mottram. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Mottram based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Mottram. Sarah Mottram is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 63 | |
| 6 | 76 | |
| 7 | 133 | |
| 8 | 137 | |
| 9 | 42 | |
| 10 | 46 | |
| 11 | 148 | |
| 12 | 60 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | Impaired control of scapular rotation during a clinical dissociation test in people with a history of shoulder pain | 5 |
| 15 | 53 | |
| 16 | 53 | |
| 17 | 49 | |
| 18 | 67 | |
| 19 | 173 | |
| 20 | 280 |
About Sarah Mottram
Sarah Mottram is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Pharmacology and Surgery, having authored 35 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shoulder Injury and Treatment (21 papers), Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries (16 papers) and Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (465 citations), Pharmacology (887 citations) and Surgery (1.3k citations). Sarah Mottram has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Mark Comerford, Jo Nijs, Filip Struyf, Romain Meeusen, Steven Truijen, Nathalie Roussel, Dylan Morrissey, Jean‐Pierre Baeyens, R. C. Woledge and María Stokes. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Sports Medicine, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery and European Spine Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.