Margot De Kooning

938 total citations
35 papers, 684 citations indexed

About

Margot De Kooning is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Margot De Kooning has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 684 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Pharmacology, 19 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Margot De Kooning's work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (28 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (16 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers). Margot De Kooning is often cited by papers focused on Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (28 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (16 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers). Margot De Kooning collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Sweden. Margot De Kooning's co-authors include Jo Nijs, Kelly Ickmans, Nathalie Roussel, Mira Meeus, Jessica Van Oosterwijck, Filip Struyf, Mari Lundberg, Liesbeth Daenen, Enrique Lluch and Lorna Paul and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Pain and Physical Therapy.

In The Last Decade

Margot De Kooning

34 papers receiving 660 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Margot De Kooning Belgium 14 384 349 129 112 99 35 684
Tomohiko Nishigami Japan 18 548 1.4× 310 0.9× 214 1.7× 90 0.8× 131 1.3× 63 910
Paul van Wilgen Belgium 12 464 1.2× 246 0.7× 210 1.6× 71 0.6× 157 1.6× 28 775
John Booth Australia 13 542 1.4× 211 0.6× 195 1.5× 94 0.8× 146 1.5× 26 827
D. Hallner Germany 11 679 1.8× 425 1.2× 85 0.7× 80 0.7× 173 1.7× 19 840
Meredith M. Hartzell United States 8 661 1.7× 547 1.6× 313 2.4× 108 1.0× 137 1.4× 17 1.1k
María Palacios‐Ceña Spain 22 339 0.9× 483 1.4× 255 2.0× 285 2.5× 131 1.3× 59 1.2k
Enrique Lluch Girbés Spain 13 604 1.6× 281 0.8× 236 1.8× 113 1.0× 169 1.7× 22 879
Dana L. Dailey United States 16 519 1.4× 376 1.1× 286 2.2× 163 1.5× 100 1.0× 39 1.1k
Jacqui Clark Belgium 9 385 1.0× 254 0.7× 208 1.6× 76 0.7× 98 1.0× 15 666
Corey B. Simon United States 17 664 1.7× 197 0.6× 206 1.6× 150 1.3× 150 1.5× 55 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Margot De Kooning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Margot De Kooning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margot De Kooning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margot De Kooning more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Margot De Kooning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margot De Kooning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margot De Kooning. The network helps show where Margot De Kooning may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margot De Kooning

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margot De Kooning. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margot De Kooning based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margot De Kooning. Margot De Kooning is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kooning, Margot De, Jo Nijs, Anne Berquin, et al.. (2024). Enhancing healthcare professionals' biopsychosocial perspective to chronic pain: assessing the impact of implementing an interdisciplinary training program. Pain. 166(3). 644–655. 2 indexed citations
3.
Leysen, Laurence, et al.. (2024). Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the revised neurophysiology of pain questionnaire. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 40. 777–785.
4.
Demoulin, Christophe, Nathalie Roussel, C.P. van Wilgen, et al.. (2024). Comparing physical therapy students' attitudes and beliefs regarding chronic low back pain and knee osteoarthritis: an international multi-institutional comparison between 2013 and 2020 academic years. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy. 28(1). 100592–100592. 2 indexed citations
7.
Oostendorp, R.A.B., Emiel van Trijffel, Geert M. Rutten, et al.. (2022). Improved quality of physiotherapy care in patients with Whiplash-Associated Disorders: Results based on 16 years of routinely collected data. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 929385–929385. 1 indexed citations
8.
Oostendorp, R.A.B., Emiel van Trijffel, Geert M. Rutten, et al.. (2020). <p>Relationships Between Context, Process, and Outcome Indicators to Assess Quality of Physiotherapy Care in Patients with Whiplash-Associated Disorders: Applying Donabedian’s Model of Care</p>. Patient Preference and Adherence. Volume 14. 425–442. 6 indexed citations
10.
Pas, Roselien, et al.. (2020). Pain Neuroscience Education in cancer survivors with persistent pain: A pilot study. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 24(4). 239–244. 13 indexed citations
11.
Oostendorp, R.A.B., Emiel van Trijffel, Geert M. Rutten, et al.. (2020). <p>Clinical Characteristics and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Primary Care Physiotherapy in Patients with Whiplash-Associated Disorders: A Longitudinal Observational Study</p>. Patient Preference and Adherence. Volume 14. 1733–1750. 2 indexed citations
12.
Oostendorp, R.A.B., Emiel van Trijffel, Geert M. Rutten, et al.. (2018). Has the quality of physiotherapy care in patients with Whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) improved over time? A retrospective study using routinely collected data and quality indicators. Patient Preference and Adherence. Volume 12. 2291–2308. 6 indexed citations
14.
Huysmans, Eva, Kelly Ickmans, Jo Nijs, et al.. (2018). Association Between Symptoms of Central Sensitization and Cognitive Behavioral Factors in People With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Cross-sectional Study. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 41(2). 92–101. 60 indexed citations
15.
Nijs, Jo, María Encarnación Aguilar‐Ferrándiz, Yori Gidron, et al.. (2017). Auto-Targeted Neurostimulation In Chronic Low Back Pain: Why Available Evidence Rejects Its Clinical Utility.. PubMed. 20(2). E340–E342. 1 indexed citations
16.
Kooning, Margot De, Liesbeth Daenen, Sanneke Don, et al.. (2016). Abnormal Pain Response to Visual Feedback During Cervical Movements in Chronic Whiplash: An Experimental Study. Pain Practice. 17(2). 156–165. 7 indexed citations
17.
Lluch, Enrique, et al.. (2015). Prevalence, Incidence, Localization, and Pathophysiology of Myofascial Trigger Points in Patients With Spinal Pain: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 38(8). 587–600. 67 indexed citations
18.
Kooning, Margot De, et al.. (2012). How to exercise people with chronic fatigue syndrome: evidence‐based practice guidelines. European Journal of Clinical Investigation. 42(10). 1136–1144. 21 indexed citations
19.
Roussel, Nathalie, Margot De Kooning, Sarah Mottram, et al.. (2012). Motor Control and Low Back Pain in Dancers. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 34(2). 138–143. 42 indexed citations
20.
Nijs, Jo, Mira Meeus, Jessica Van Oosterwijck, et al.. (2011). Treatment of central sensitization in patients with ‘unexplained’ chronic pain: what options do we have?. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy. 12(7). 1087–1098. 90 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026