Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Efficacy, Safety, and Durability of Voretigene Neparvovec-rzyl in RPE65 Mutation–Associated Inherited Retinal Dystrophy
2019276 citationsAlbert M. Maguire, Stephen R. Russell et al.Ophthalmologyprofile →
Citations per year, relative to Sarah McCague Sarah McCague (= 1×)
peers
Seok-Hong Min
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah McCague
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah McCague's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah McCague with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah McCague more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah McCague. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah McCague. The network helps show where Sarah McCague may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah McCague
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah McCague.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah McCague based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah McCague. Sarah McCague is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Alemán, Tomás S., Rachel M. Huckfeldt, Leona Serrano, et al.. (2019). AAV2-hCHM Subretinal Delivery to the Macula in Choroideremia: 2 year Results of an Ongoing Phase I/II Gene Therapy Trial. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 60(9). 5173–5173.5 indexed citations
3.
Maguire, Albert M., Stephen R. Russell, Jennifer Wellman, et al.. (2019). Efficacy, Safety, and Durability of Voretigene Neparvovec-rzyl in RPE65 Mutation–Associated Inherited Retinal Dystrophy. Ophthalmology. 126(9). 1273–1285.276 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Alemán, Tomás S., Leona Serrano, Grace Han, et al.. (2017). AAV2-hCHM Subretinal Delivery to the Macula in Choroideremia: Preliminary Six Month Safety Results of an Ongoing Phase I/II Gene Therapy Trial. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 58(8). 4485–4485.4 indexed citations
5.
Reape, Kathleen Z., Daniel C. Chung, Jennifer Wellman, et al.. (2017). Natural History of Individuals with Retinal Degeneration Due to Biallelic Mutations in the RPE65 Gene. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 58(8). 1488–1488.2 indexed citations
Chung, Daniel C., Jennifer Wellman, Emily Liu, et al.. (2016). The Natural History of Disease Progression in Patients With RPE65-Mediated Inherited Retinal Dystrophies. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 57(12). 6588–6588.
8.
McCague, Sarah, Jennifer Wellman, Jean Bennett, et al.. (2015). Mobility testing validation study - Using a novel, standardized mobility test to evaluate functional vision in patients with inherited retinal degeneration. 56(7). 4774–4774.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.