Richard A. Wesley
- Plant Science top 10%
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Soil Science top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- C. Dennis ElmoreLarry G. HeatherlyStan R. SpurlockMark W. BaldwinDavid R. ShawW. L. BarrentineWilliam L. KingeryW. S. Anthony
- Topics
- Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (14 papers)Soybean genetics and cultivation (12 papers)Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesVietnamCanada
In The Last Decade
Richard A. Wesley
38 papers receiving 388 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Plant Science 272
- Agronomy and Crop Science 169
- Soil Science 144
- Social Psychology 68
- Clinical Psychology 36
Countries citing papers authored by Richard A. Wesley
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard A. Wesley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard A. Wesley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard A. Wesley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard A. Wesley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard A. Wesley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard A. Wesley. The network helps show where Richard A. Wesley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard A. Wesley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard A. Wesley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard A. Wesley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard A. Wesley. Richard A. Wesley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fall Deep Tillage of Tunica and Sharkey Clay: Residual Effects on Soybean Yield and Net Return | 1 |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 70 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | An Evaluation of the Cyclone Collector for Cotton Gins | 3 |
About Richard A. Wesley
Richard A. Wesley is a scholar working on Soil Science, Agronomy and Crop Science and Plant Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 451 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (14 papers), Soybean genetics and cultivation (12 papers) and Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (169 citations), Soil Science (144 citations) and Plant Science (272 citations). Richard A. Wesley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Vietnam and Canada. Frequent co-authors include C. Dennis Elmore, Larry G. Heatherly, Stan R. Spurlock, Mark W. Baldwin, David R. Shaw, W. L. Barrentine, William L. Kingery, W. S. Anthony, H. C. Pringle and Robert M. Zablotowicz. Their work appears in journals such as Crop Science, Soil and Tillage Research and Agronomy Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.