Sarah L. King
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Physiology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Marina R. PicciottoBarbara J. CaldaroneJennifer RustedNaji TabetVenetia ZachariouSimon EvansNicholas G. DowellTanya R. Stevens
- Topics
- Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (15 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (14 papers)Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Sarah L. King
51 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Molecular Biology 1.3k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 800
- Cognitive Neuroscience 354
- Physiology 324
- Psychiatry and Mental health 199
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah L. King
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah L. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah L. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah L. King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah L. King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah L. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah L. King. The network helps show where Sarah L. King may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah L. King
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah L. King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah L. King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah L. King. Sarah L. King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 81 | |
| 7 | 130 | |
| 8 | 75 | |
| 9 | 40 | |
| 10 | 82 | |
| 11 | 125 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 53 | |
| 15 | 71 | |
| 16 | 108 | |
| 17 | 67 | |
| 18 | 64 | |
| 19 | 178 | |
| 20 | 161 |
About Sarah L. King
Sarah L. King is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 52 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (15 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (14 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (800 citations), Biological Psychiatry (106 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (148 citations). Sarah L. King has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Marina R. Picciotto, Barbara J. Caldarone, Jennifer Rusted, Naji Tabet, Venetia Zachariou, Simon Evans, Nicholas G. Dowell, Tanya R. Stevens, David Stephens and Paul S. Tofts. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Neuron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.