R. F. Hess
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 2%
- Co-authors
- David FieldAnthony J. HayesBenjamin ThompsonSteven C. DakinBehzad MansouriR. E. SoodakJ. I. SimpsonJiawei Zhou
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (45 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (16 papers)Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
R. F. Hess
51 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.3k
- Epidemiology 681
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 397
- Molecular Biology 381
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 368
Countries citing papers authored by R. F. Hess
This map shows the geographic impact of R. F. Hess's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. F. Hess with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. F. Hess more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. F. Hess
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. F. Hess. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. F. Hess. The network helps show where R. F. Hess may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. F. Hess
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. F. Hess. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. F. Hess based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. F. Hess. R. F. Hess is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 192 | |
| 6 | 47 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 39 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | Relative contribution of under- and irregular sampling in strabismic amblyopia | 1 |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 76 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 65 | |
| 16 | 42 | |
| 17 | Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field”breakdown → | 1204 |
| 18 | 56 | |
| 19 | Contrast sensitivity assessment of functional amblyopia in humans. | 29 |
| 20 | Brain tumors and other space occupying processes | 4 |
About R. F. Hess
R. F. Hess is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Ophthalmology and Epidemiology, having authored 56 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (45 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (16 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (2.3k citations), Ophthalmology (363 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (397 citations). R. F. Hess has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Field, Anthony J. Hayes, Benjamin Thompson, Steven C. Dakin, Behzad Mansouri, R. E. Soodak, J. I. Simpson, Jiawei Zhou, Kathy T. Mullen and Simon Clavagnier. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, The Journal of Physiology and Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.