Sarah J. Gervais

3.2k total citations
90 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Sarah J. Gervais is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah J. Gervais has authored 90 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Gender Studies, 27 papers in Clinical Psychology and 27 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Sarah J. Gervais's work include Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (19 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (18 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (18 papers). Sarah J. Gervais is often cited by papers focused on Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (19 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (18 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (18 papers). Sarah J. Gervais collaborates with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Spain. Sarah J. Gervais's co-authors include Theresa K. Vescio, Jill Allen, M. Meghan Davidson, Philippe Bernard, Olivier Klein, Amy L. Hillard, David DiLillo, Mark Snyder, Ann E. Hoover and Michael D. Dodd and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Food Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Sarah J. Gervais

84 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Sarah J. Gervais United States	26	955	760	743	452	422	90	2.0k
Jennifer L. Petersen United States	14	537 0.6×	516 0.7×	763 1.0×	592 1.3×	678 1.6×	24	2.2k
T. Andrew Poehlman United States	7	322 0.3×	1.3k 1.8×	330 0.4×	827 1.8×	282 0.7×	11	2.2k
Timothy D. Ritchie United States	22	346 0.4×	457 0.6×	396 0.5×	1.1k 2.5×	375 0.9×	43	2.0k
Jacob Juhl United States	20	608 0.6×	452 0.6×	440 0.6×	1.6k 3.6×	118 0.3×	38	1.9k
Christine Logel Canada	17	324 0.3×	688 0.9×	283 0.4×	610 1.3×	349 0.8×	32	1.8k
Patrick M. Markey United States	32	203 0.2×	833 1.1×	1.3k 1.8×	841 1.9×	523 1.2×	89	2.5k
Charles T. Hill United States	16	235 0.2×	578 0.8×	370 0.5×	848 1.9×	344 0.8×	32	1.5k
Connie Wolfe United States	6	178 0.2×	825 1.1×	535 0.7×	941 2.1×	409 1.0×	6	1.8k
Lauri L. Hyers United States	10	616 0.6×	969 1.3×	268 0.4×	473 1.0×	91 0.2×	14	1.4k
Joshua Hart United States	19	181 0.2×	602 0.8×	456 0.6×	866 1.9×	184 0.4×	39	1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah J. Gervais

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah J. Gervais's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah J. Gervais with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah J. Gervais more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah J. Gervais

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah J. Gervais. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah J. Gervais. The network helps show where Sarah J. Gervais may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah J. Gervais

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah J. Gervais. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah J. Gervais based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah J. Gervais. Sarah J. Gervais is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Gervais, Sarah J., et al.. (2025). Alcohol administration in studies of human aggression: a methodological review. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 51(4). 395–412.

Brock, Rebecca L. & Sarah J. Gervais. (2025). The psychometric properties of a new scale of dehumanizing deindividuation in couples.. Journal of Family Psychology. 39(2). 171–183.

Kumar, Shaina A., et al.. (2024). Progressive moral foundations and empathic concern: Facilitators of sexual assault bystander intervention.. Psychology of Violence. 15(1). 121–132. 1 indexed citations

Gervais, Sarah J., et al.. (2023). An Integrated Conceptual Framework Linking Attachment Insecurity to Increased Risk for Both Enacting and Experiencing Objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 47(3). 365–386. 5 indexed citations

DiLillo, David, Sarah J. Gervais, & Dennis E. McChargue. (2023). Alcohol and Sexual Violence. 5 indexed citations

Gervais, Sarah J., et al.. (2022). A triangulation study of young Women's motivations for sending nudes to men. Computers in Human Behavior. 140. 107561–107561. 2 indexed citations

Gervais, Sarah J., et al.. (2022). Is It Reasonable? Reasonable and Unreasonable Accommodations for Occupational Therapy Students in Clinical Settings. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 10(2). 1–15. 5 indexed citations

Brock, Rebecca L., et al.. (2022). The development and psychometric evaluation of the Objectification Perpetration Scale.. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 69(4). 541–553. 7 indexed citations

Bernard, Philippe, et al.. (2021). Is body inversion effect a valid measure of women's objectification? Yes, it is!. Personality and Individual Differences. 175. 110708–110708. 5 indexed citations

10.

Brock, Rebecca L., et al.. (2020). The Role of Interpersonal Sexual Objectification in Heterosexual Intimate Partner Violence From Perspectives of Perceivers and Targets. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 37(3-4). 1430–1455. 18 indexed citations

11.

Brock, Rebecca L., et al.. (2019). Objectification in Heterosexual Romantic Relationships: Examining Relationship Satisfaction of Female Objectification Recipients and Male Objectifying Perpetrators. Sex Roles. 81(5-6). 370–384. 23 indexed citations

12.

Wiener, Richard L., et al.. (2016). Differences in the eyes of the beholders: The roles of subjective and objective judgments in sexual harassment claims.. Law and Human Behavior. 40(3). 319–336. 5 indexed citations

13.

Klein, Olivier & Sarah J. Gervais. (2015). Objectifying others: Social psychological perspectives. Cairn.info. 28(1). 7–14. 4 indexed citations

14.

Bernard, Philippe, et al.. (2015). Body parts reduction and self-objectification in the objectification of sexualized bodies. Cairn.info. 28(1). 39–61. 11 indexed citations

15.

Gervais, Sarah J., et al.. (2015). Who treats people as sex objects? Cultural orientation, social comparison, and sexual objectification perpetration. Cairn.info. 28(1). 153–181. 11 indexed citations

16.

Davidson, M. Meghan, et al.. (2013). The Ripple Effects of Stranger Harassment on Objectification of Self and Others. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 39(1). 53–66. 37 indexed citations

17.

Davidson, M. Meghan, et al.. (2013). Associations Between Women’s Experiences of Sexual Violence and Forgiveness. Violence and Victims. 28(6). 1041–1053. 10 indexed citations

18.

Bernard, Philippe, et al.. (2012). Integrating Sexual Objectification With Object Versus PersonRecognition: The Sexualized-Body-Inversion Hypothesis. Insecta mundi. 2 indexed citations

19.

Nah, Fiona Fui‐Hoon, et al.. (2009). Are Male and Female Avatars Perceived Equally in 3D Virtual Worlds. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 3088–3095. 6 indexed citations

20.

Vescio, Theresa K., Sarah J. Gervais, Larisa Heiphetz, & Brittany Bloodhart. (2009). The Stereotypic Behaviors of the Powerful and Their Effect on the Relatively Powerless. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact