Sarah H. Stephens
- Molecular Biology
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Genetics
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems
- Co-authors
- Peter J. HansenAlan R. ShuldinerBraxton D. MitchellKathleen A. RyanRandal G. RossMarissa A. EhringerAlexis L. FranksJudith Logel
- Topics
- Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (5 papers)Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (3 papers)Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaDenmark
In The Last Decade
Sarah H. Stephens
15 papers receiving 362 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Molecular Biology 147
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 60
- Genetics 55
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 54
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 39
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah H. Stephens
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah H. Stephens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah H. Stephens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah H. Stephens more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah H. Stephens
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah H. Stephens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah H. Stephens. The network helps show where Sarah H. Stephens may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah H. Stephens
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah H. Stephens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah H. Stephens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah H. Stephens. Sarah H. Stephens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 59 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 83 | |
| 15 | Orangutan population biology, life history, and conservation: Perspectives from PVA models | 3 |
| 16 | 53 |
About Sarah H. Stephens
Sarah H. Stephens is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Pharmacology and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 16 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (5 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (3 papers) and Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (18 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (39 citations) and Internal Medicine (13 citations). Sarah H. Stephens has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Peter J. Hansen, Alan R. Shuldiner, Braxton D. Mitchell, Kathleen A. Ryan, Randal G. Ross, Marissa A. Ehringer, Alexis L. Franks, Judith Logel, Brandie D. Wagner and Sherry Leonard. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis and Schizophrenia Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.