Sarah Gildea

576 citations
23 papers · 447 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Sarah Gildea

23 papers receiving 437 citations

Peers

Sarah Gildea
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 340
  • Epidemiology 388
  • Animal Science and Zoology 78
  • Equine 12
  • Microbiology 35
Replace Adam Rash with:
Adam Rash United Kingdom
Bernt Hjertner Sweden
Eliana Monteforte Cassaro Villalobos Brazil
T Sugiura Japan
Stéphane Gorin France
Nichole Hines United States
Ed Dubovi United States
Stephen Valas France
Sandra Newbury United States
Xiaoli Hao China
Sarah Gildea relative to Adam Rash United Kingdom Adam Rash's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Adam Rash · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Gildea

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Gildea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Gildea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Gildea more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Gildea

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Gildea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Gildea. The network helps show where Sarah Gildea may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Gildea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Gildea Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Gildea links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201146
2 201141
3 201336
4 201133
5 200733
6 201126
7 201324
8 201524
9 201422
10 201021
11 201817
12 201316
13 201316
14 201615
15 201512
16 201611
17 20149
18 20179
19 20199
20 20179

About Sarah Gildea

Sarah Gildea is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Agronomy and Crop Science, Infectious Diseases, Immunology and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 447 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Influenza Virus Research Studies (20 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (19 papers), Respiratory viral infections research (6 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (5 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (4 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (3 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (2 papers) and Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (340 citations), Epidemiology (388 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (78 citations), Equine (12 citations) and Microbiology (35 citations). Sarah Gildea has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ann Cullinane, Seán Arkins, Cathal Walsh, Michelle Quinlivan, David A. Fitzpatrick, Marie Garvey, Koji Tsujimura, Hiroshi Bannai, Manabu Nemoto and Takashi Yamanaka. Their work appears in journals such as Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses, Equine Veterinary Journal, Vaccine, Archives of Virology and Pathogens.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact