Countries where authors publish in Archives of Virology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Archives of Virology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Archives of Virology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Archives of Virology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Archives of Virology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Archives of Virology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Archives of Virology.
About Archives of Virology
The 13.6k papers published in Archives of Virology in the last decades have received a total of 264.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Archives of Virology usually cover Endocrinology (1.6k papers), Animal Science and Zoology (2.6k papers) and Infectious Diseases (4.3k papers) specifically the topics of Plant Virus Research Studies (3.3k papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (2.6k papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (2.5k papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (2.1k papers), Viral Infections and Immunology Research (1.7k papers), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (1.5k papers), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (1.5k papers) and Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (1.4k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Archives of Virology are M. J. Adams, Hans-W. Ackermann, C. R. Pringle, Robert G. Webster, Maurice Pensaert, Edward P. Rybicki, D. J. Alexander, Michael J. Studdert, C. Fauquet and Arvind Varsani.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.