Sarah E. Ackermann

8 papers receiving 77 citations

Peers

Sarah E. Ackermann
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Cancer Research 17
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 24
  • Toxicology 3
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 13
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 5
Replace Nicola Laurence with:
Nicola Laurence United Kingdom
Fabio Volterra United States
Laura Monovich United States
Anna Maria Lavecchia Italy
Hua Ye China
Sabrina Johanna Fletcher Argentina
Dieter Görtz Germany
Anil Chhabra United States
Beatriz Núñez Spain
Luis Eduardo Rosa Zucca Brazil
Sarah E. Ackermann relative to Nicola Laurence United Kingdom Nicola Laurence's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Nicola Laurence · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah E. Ackermann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah E. Ackermann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah E. Ackermann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah E. Ackermann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah E. Ackermann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah E. Ackermann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah E. Ackermann. The network helps show where Sarah E. Ackermann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah E. Ackermann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah E. Ackermann Line = papers co-authored together Sarah E. Ackermann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 201230
2 200725
3
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: which diagnostic procedures can be used?
200512
4 20008
5 20202
6
Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie. Phase II study of weekly docetaxel in patients with recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer: AGO Uterus-4
20071
7 20141
8 20211
9 20130

About Sarah E. Ackermann

Sarah E. Ackermann is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Research and Small Animals, having authored 9 papers that have together received 80 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (2 papers), Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases (1 paper), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (1 paper), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (1 paper), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (1 paper), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (1 paper) and Reproductive Biology and Fertility (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (17 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (24 citations), Toxicology (3 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (13 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (5 citations). Sarah E. Ackermann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Bogenrieder, Matthias W. Beckmann, Andreas Perrot, Volker Ruppert, Thomas Meyer, Sabine Pankuweit, Silke Sperling, Anette Richter, Maximilian Posch and Bernhard Maisch. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Cancer, European Journal of Human Genetics, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer and Oncology Research and Treatment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact