Stephen F. King

18.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
369 papers, 11.8k citations indexed

About

Stephen F. King is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen F. King has authored 369 papers receiving a total of 11.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 339 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 82 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 11 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in Stephen F. King's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (312 papers), Neutrino Physics Research (185 papers) and Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (101 papers). Stephen F. King is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (312 papers), Neutrino Physics Research (185 papers) and Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (101 papers). Stephen F. King collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Stephen F. King's co-authors include Christoph Luhn, Stefan Antusch, R. Nevzorov, Stefano Moretti, Gui-Jun Ding, Ivo de Medeiros Varzielas, P. L. White, Michal Malinský, Thomas F. Burgess and Mar Bastero-Gil and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Nuclear Physics B.

In The Last Decade

Stephen F. King

361 papers receiving 11.5k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Neutrino mass and mixing with discrete symmetry

2013 508 citations Stephen F. King, Christoph Luhn profile →

Peers

Stephen F. King

NHEP

AA

MIS

SPS

SNP

B. R. Iyer India

F. B. McDonald United States

Martin Walker United Kingdom

Leo Van Hove Belgium

R. G. McMahon United Kingdom

Lei Wu China

Dap Hartmann Netherlands

David Kaiser United States

John Morgan United States

S. K. Samaddar India

B. R. Iyer India

Stephen F. King

1.4k ×0.1

NHEP

5.2k ×1.9

AA

361 ×1.5

MIS

357 ×1.5

SPS

298 ×1.4

SNP

Citations per year, relative to Stephen F. King Stephen F. King (= 1×) peers B. R. Iyer

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen F. King

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen F. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen F. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen F. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen F. King

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen F. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen F. King. The network helps show where Stephen F. King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen F. King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen F. King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen F. King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen F. King. Stephen F. King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

King, Stephen F., Xin Wang, & Ye-Ling Zhou. (2025). Modular domain walls and gravitational waves. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2025(7). 11–11.

2.

Gouttenoire, Yann, Stephen F. King, Rishav Roshan, et al.. (2025). Cosmological consequences of domain walls biased by quantum gravity. Physical review. D. 112(7).

3.

King, Stephen F., et al.. (2024). Landing Gear Health Assessment: Synergising Flight Data Analysis with Theoretical Prognostics in a Hybrid Assessment Approach. PHM Society European Conference. 8(1). 10–10. 3 indexed citations

4.

King, Stephen F., G.K. Leontaris, & Ye-Ling Zhou. (2024). Flipped SU(5): unification, proton decay, fermion masses and gravitational waves. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2024(3). 12 indexed citations

5.

King, Stephen F. & Xin Wang. (2024). Modulus stabilization in the multiple-modulus framework. Physical review. D. 110(7). 3 indexed citations

6.

Ghosh, Tathagata, Anish Ghoshal, Huai-Ke Guo, et al.. (2024). Did we hear the sound of the Universe boiling? Analysis using the full fluid velocity profiles and NANOGrav 15-year data. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2024(5). 100–100. 25 indexed citations

7.

King, Stephen F., Rishav Roshan, Xin Wang, Graham White, & Masahito Yamazaki. (2024). Quantum gravity effects on fermionic dark matter and gravitational waves. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2024(5). 71–71. 7 indexed citations

8.

Fu, Bowen, et al.. (2024). Type-I two-Higgs-doublet model and gravitational waves from domain walls bounded by strings. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2024(8). 4 indexed citations

9.

King, Stephen F. & Xin Wang. (2024). Modular invariant hilltop inflation. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2024(7). 73–73. 13 indexed citations

10.

King, Stephen F., Rishav Roshan, Xin Wang, Graham White, & Masahito Yamazaki. (2024). Quantum gravity effects on dark matter and gravitational waves. Physical review. D. 109(2). 21 indexed citations

11.

Fu, Bowen & Stephen F. King. (2023). Gravitational wave signals from leptoquark-induced first-order electroweak phase transitions. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2023(5). 55–55. 4 indexed citations

12.

Costa, Francesco & Stephen F. King. (2023). Neutrino Mixing Sum Rules and the Littlest Seesaw. Universe. 9(11). 472–472. 5 indexed citations

13.

King, Stephen F., et al.. (2023). Tri-hypercharge: a separate gauged weak hypercharge for each fermion family as the origin of flavour. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2023(8). 21 indexed citations

14.

Ding, Gui-Jun, Stephen F. King, & Jun-Nan Lu. (2021). SO(10) models with A 4 modular symmetry. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 33 indexed citations

15.

Fu, Bowen, Marco Chianese, & Stephen F. King. (2021). . Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 28 indexed citations

16.

Garrido‐Moreno, Aurora, Nigel Lockett, Victor Jesús García Morales, & Stephen F. King. (2020). Social media use and value-creation: a dynamic-capabilities perspective. Journal of service management. 2 indexed citations

17.

King, Stephen F., et al.. (2017). Higgs portal dark matter and neutrino mass and mixing with a doubly charged scalar. Physics Letters B. 769. 121–128. 5 indexed citations

18.

Varzielas, Ivo de Medeiros, et al.. (2017). Minima of multi-Higgs potentials with triplets of Δ(3 n 2 ) and Δ(6 n 2 ). Physics Letters B. 775. 303–310. 13 indexed citations

19.

Athron, Peter, Jonathan P. Hall, Stephen F. King, et al.. (2011). Collider phenomenology of the E6SSM. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 1 indexed citations

20.

Hirsch, M. & Stephen F. King. (2001). Discriminating Neutrino Mass Models. arXiv (Cornell University). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact