Sarah Brook

474 total citations
7 papers, 332 citations indexed

About

Sarah Brook is a scholar working on Ecology, Social Psychology and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Brook has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 332 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Ecology, 4 papers in Social Psychology and 3 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Sarah Brook's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (5 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (3 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers). Sarah Brook is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (5 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (3 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers). Sarah Brook collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Sarah Brook's co-authors include Jedediah F. Brodie, Rachakonda Sreekar, Matthew Scott Luskin, Brett R. Scheffers, Hannah O’Kelly, Nandini Velho, Rhett D. Harrison, Madhu Rao, Simon P. Mahood and Barney Long and has published in prestigious journals such as Conservation Biology, Biological Conservation and Conservation Letters.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Brook

7 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Sarah Brook Australia	6	270	94	81	69	62	7	332
Simon P. Mahood Australia	13	279 1.0×	133 1.4×	101 1.2×	109 1.6×	58 0.9×	24	405
Mahendra Shrestha United States	4	305 1.1×	78 0.8×	82 1.0×	64 0.9×	42 0.7×	6	362
Vivek Menon India	7	270 1.0×	93 1.0×	121 1.5×	79 1.1×	44 0.7×	17	383
Naruemon Tantipisanuh Thailand	11	313 1.2×	66 0.7×	124 1.5×	72 1.0×	75 1.2×	25	385
Anak Pattanavibool Thailand	11	340 1.3×	121 1.3×	129 1.6×	61 0.9×	54 0.9×	19	399
Giordano Ciocheti Brazil	9	462 1.7×	159 1.7×	134 1.7×	53 0.8×	56 0.9×	12	519
Jeanetta Selier South Africa	9	348 1.3×	77 0.8×	60 0.7×	76 1.1×	50 0.8×	27	446
M. Firoz Ahmed India	8	218 0.8×	65 0.7×	135 1.7×	70 1.0×	35 0.6×	19	305
Deo Kujirakwinja United States	11	233 0.9×	75 0.8×	90 1.1×	119 1.7×	92 1.5×	19	378
Roberto Salom‐Pérez United States	11	373 1.4×	71 0.8×	113 1.4×	38 0.6×	80 1.3×	26	416

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Brook

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Brook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Brook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Brook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Brook

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Brook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Brook. The network helps show where Sarah Brook may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Brook

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Brook. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Brook based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Brook. Sarah Brook is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Brook, Sarah, et al.. (2022). Reviewing the status and demise of the Endangered Eld’s deer and identifying priority sites and conservation actions in Cambodia. Mammalia. 86(5). 407–421. 5 indexed citations

2.

Richman, Nadia I., Julia P. G. Jones, Simon Northridge, et al.. (2019). Fishing for the facts: river dolphin bycatch in a small‐scale freshwater fishery in Bangladesh. Animal Conservation. 23(2). 160–170. 18 indexed citations

3.

McGowan, Philip J.K., Louise Mair, James R.S. Westrip, et al.. (2018). Tracking trends in the extinction risk of wild relatives of domesticated species to assess progress against global biodiversity targets. Conservation Letters. 12(1). 8 indexed citations

4.

Harrison, Rhett D., Rachakonda Sreekar, Jedediah F. Brodie, et al.. (2016). Impacts of hunting on tropical forests in Southeast Asia. Conservation Biology. 30(5). 972–981. 194 indexed citations

5.

Brook, Sarah, Nigel Dudley, Simon P. Mahood, et al.. (2014). Lessons learned from the loss of a flagship: The extinction of the Javan rhinoceros Rhinoceros sondaicus annamiticus from Vietnam. Biological Conservation. 174. 21–29. 63 indexed citations

6.

Brook, Sarah, Peter T. Boag, Barney Long, et al.. (2012). Integrated and novel survey methods for rhinoceros populations confirm the extinction of Rhinoceros sondaicus annamiticus from Vietnam. Biological Conservation. 155. 59–67. 35 indexed citations

7.

Brook, Sarah, Alastair Grant, & Diana Bell. (2009). Can land crabs be used as a rapid ecosystem evaluation tool? A test using distribution and abundance of several genera from the Seychelles. Acta Oecologica. 35(5). 711–719. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact