Sarah Bay‐Cheng
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 1%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Sociology and Political Science
- Music top 5%
- Co-authors
- Chiel KattenbeltRobin NelsonDavid SaltzJennifer Parker-StarbuckDave PapeStuart C. ShapiroDerek Miller
- Topics
- Theatre and Performance Studies (12 papers)Cinema and Media Studies (8 papers)Artistic and Creative Research (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of HomosexualityTheatre JournalComputers in entertainment
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Sarah Bay‐Cheng
20 papers receiving 80 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 84
- Literature and Literary Theory 57
- Economics and Econometrics 40
- Sociology and Political Science 22
- Music 21
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Bay‐Cheng
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Bay‐Cheng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Bay‐Cheng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Bay‐Cheng more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Bay‐Cheng
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Bay‐Cheng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Bay‐Cheng. The network helps show where Sarah Bay‐Cheng may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Bay‐Cheng
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Bay‐Cheng. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Bay‐Cheng based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Bay‐Cheng. Sarah Bay‐Cheng is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | Performance and Media: Taxonomies for a Changing Field | 10 |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | Mapping Intermediality in Performance | 19 |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | Mama Dada: Gertrude Stein's Avant-Garde Theatre | 16 |
About Sarah Bay‐Cheng
Sarah Bay‐Cheng is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Music and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 25 papers that have together received 130 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theatre and Performance Studies (12 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (8 papers) and Artistic and Creative Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (84 citations), Music (21 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (57 citations). Sarah Bay‐Cheng has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Chiel Kattenbelt, Robin Nelson, David Saltz, Jennifer Parker-Starbuck, Dave Pape, Stuart C. Shapiro and Derek Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Homosexuality, Theatre Journal and Computers in entertainment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.